I find this a weird thing to worry about. $300k across 6 years is $50k per year. They have over 10k staff so that's $5 per staff member per year. It sounds like incredible value!
I say let them have their slushy fund!
this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
24 points (92.9% liked)
NZ Politics
561 readers
2 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!
This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi
This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick
Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It would have been helpful if the rnz article provided some context, like the fact that we spend $2.4 billion per year on the Corrections Department.
$50k / $2.4 bn = 0.002% of the corrections department total spending goes on slushies. It's a drop in a bucket.
The real scandal here is we spend $2.4 bn on prisons.
Yeah but these articles are almost always planted by the Taxpayer's Onion so they don't care about the proportion of the spend, or how it might make working in such a place slightly more tolerable, its all just a BS shitpost to make people think the public service wastes lots of money.
I can promise anybody that corporates throw way more money around on stuff way stupider than $50k per year on some icey beverages.
Hell, some corporates provide financial backing to the morons at the TU so, yeah.
100% my first thought too. Cultivate the vibes of enormous public sector waste that doesn't stand up to basic scrutiny, in terms of substance or scale.
Then people get shocked Pikachu face when the so called waste getting cut is actually school lunches, hospitals, customs officers and so on because this stuff is miniscule compared to the targets the govt has set, and the amount they want to give away in tax cuts.
We have about 8,000 prisoners. That's 300k per year per prisoner?
Figures I've heard previously were more like $150k so I guess Corrections spends a lot outside of prisons?
Parole checks and home detention and community detention for example.
Yes that makes sense. I also wonder if that budget includes funding for rehabilitation programmes.
I assume so, hence "corrections" rather than "incarceration" being the department name ;-)
I don't know an intra-departmental breakdown. That might take some digging.
In the interest.co.nz article I linked to earlier it has a figure of $1.7bn for the year 2017. Big increases in 2018 and 2020. Labour invested heavily in prisons!
Weird because there were also huge drops in prison population under Labour! Was down from something like 10k to 7k off the top of my head.
But also that's operational costs not capital investment, so probably not so much investing in prisons and more just an increase in costs.
That's an increase of about 6% per year assuming 1.7 in 2017 and 2.4 in 2023. High but not crazy considering what's happened in that time.
Ya, expecially compared to $5000+ per slushie machine.
Heck, I’d certainly PAY $5 a year to have a slushy machine at my job. Especially during those hot summer days. That’d certainly improve MY job satisfaction.
This is a dog-whistle.
It's a rounding error amount of the corrections budget, and cost-effective.
Buried in here is criticism of how much is spent on corrections and that we should be spending less (i.e. have poorer quality prisons for inmates and staff).
Remember every tax dollar spent was stolen from businesses and the bourgeoisie.
So what? Am I supposed to freak out about this? Why shouldn't the prisoners have slushies?
It's not the prisoners that are getting the slushies, it's the staff
Even less of a reason to get upset.