this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
44 points (94.0% liked)

Apple

17651 readers
172 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PP_BOY_ 36 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

This comment on the original article is almost exactly what I was going to say here

Whose expectations? Couldn't have been mine as I expected very few buyers due to the high price and no compelling use case. (Source: sw1tcher)

Next headline: "People cut back on discretionary spending in the face of rising cost-of-living unaffordability crisis. Sales down for $3,499.99 pair of goggles and caviar."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Apple's, shareholder's... Economists doing 8 balls of their secretaries chest. No body sane thought this was gonna sell like hot cakes.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Yeah and to be fair 400-450k is still in the realm of $1.4bn in revenue. That's pretty good for a new product in year 1 (and presumably the device is at least marginally profitable at the high price - if not it's a gamble on the future). And sales like that for something that is basically an expensive proof of concept is pretty impressive.

[–] HollandJim 4 points 8 months ago

It’s also basically a dev kit. $1.4B is not nothing.

[–] acosmichippo 2 points 8 months ago

(and presumably the device is at least marginally profitable at the high price

parts alone, maybe. with R&D factored in, probably not.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

That's plan, not actual. I somehow doubt it'll even reach that level; it's trying to save face with investors.

While the tech is impressive, I'm surprised Apple didn't do enough research beforehand to understand if there's a market for chunky $3500 computer goggles. None of this is really new tech, and I'm sure the sentiment isn't hard to find.

[–] Donebrach 2 points 8 months ago

Another Apple newton. I bet in 20 years they’ll put out another attempt in the form factor of almost-regular eyeglasses and it’ll actually revolutionize AR computing.