this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
529 points (98.4% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35846 readers
2076 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sorry if this pic is a bit blurry. I took a photo of my colleges computer screen from my phone.

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Izzy 49 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If it is more ad than news I'd say this an ad site that happens to have some news.

[–] STRIKINGdebate2 3 points 2 years ago

Yup. And the thing that kills me about this is they are all ads for the exact same company.

[–] Presi300 30 points 2 years ago
[–] itsnotlupus 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Several times now, I've sent people I knew links to articles that looked perfectly fine to me, but turned out to be unusable ad-ridden garbage to them.

Since then, I try to remember to disable uBlock Origin to check what they'll actually see before I share any links.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

You know, I never thought about that until now. Not that I send that many links out, but still another thing to think about.

[–] Capricorny90210 15 points 2 years ago

It looks pretty good for a picture of a screen.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

Gross, someone injected news into this ad site.

[–] Hazdaz 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I bet on mobile it is even worse!

Using a web browser on your phone is almost completely useless these days what with how messed up the formatting is and how many endless ads there are. The most irritating thing is how a lot of news sites don't even both including images of their news stories. Probably to save the bandwidth. I've noticed stories which referred to photos or drawings and none were visible on mobile. Of all media formats, one would think a web browser on a high resolution screen would be a great one to depict images. Nope. At least not on a lot of sites. They probably prefer to use that space for more ads, I think.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I use Firefox for Android with uBlock Origin and the ads don't even download. Saves on bandwidth and makes the web usable.

[–] Hazdaz 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I might have to look into that, but even if the ads all went away, the formating for mobile sites is atrocious.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

No doubt. For a huge proportion of sites I just use the desktop version plus pinch to zoom

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

I actually just stayed using kiwi browser since it's a chromium fork that supports plugins on Android. Ublock and some other choice extensions are going pretty well for me so far

[–] sixapples 7 points 2 years ago

It was literally always like this. Newspapers had a large fraction of material content dedicated to full and half page ads and regularly included entire sections of an ad as ‘sponsored content’. Half the remainder is PR placement and the other half is establishment propaganda and weather and sports. It was always this way.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Sooo your average news site now.

[–] Skellybones 6 points 2 years ago

And they wonder why people don't visit News sites

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

That's how all the tech sites have gotten, by the way. Engadget, The Verge, Macrumors.. all devoting huge space to Amazon Prime ads masquerading as journalism. Amazing that Amazon pulled this off through their affiliate program.

[–] tallwookie 5 points 2 years ago

only ever really see ads when I'm at work. all the things are blocked at home & on phone.

[–] AllonzeeLV 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The Capitalist idea of Utopia.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I hope there are alternatives for news, because this looks horrible

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Only "mildly" infuriating??

[–] ElectroVagrant 3 points 2 years ago

lmao, right? This moves beyond "mild" to plain ol' infuriating imo.

[–] lemminer 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Er, yes? Were you summoning me?

[–] lemminer 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

not you, these poor people running websites filled with ads.

[–] itsJoelleScott 1 points 2 years ago

Ooh yeah, I never thought about that. While I disagree with some of my funcitonals, I don't die inside knowing it's going to be painful to people viewing ads.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Pure clickbait! I'm not even going to bother heading to it.

[–] gooddaytodayhere 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To be fair to the journal, most people use the app which is far more palatable. This is their Home Screen right now for example https://ibb.co/fS4gmJc

[–] grue 2 points 2 years ago

That's only because the app is making them money by stealing all the personal info it can from your device instead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

What about when you scroll down?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

So are ars technica and gizmodo, which are also just giant Apple advertisement sites