Continuing the trend of not being innovative ever since Jobs' passing.
this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
102 points (92.5% liked)
Apple
16867 readers
11 users here now
Welcome
to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!
Rules:
- No NSFW Content
- No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
- No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread
Communities of Interest:
Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple
Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode
Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Apple Watch was not innovative? Apple Silicon was not innovative? Vision Pro was not innovative?
Look at you, all entitled to Apple’s innovation.
Pretty sure Apple Watch was already in progress when Steve was alive.
Apple just wait until something already exists and then make a more expensive version of it that's not innovation. I'm not saying that something like the vision pro isn't a good product but it's not groundbreaking in any way.
As demonstrated by the fact that Apple made it without any real idea of what it was actually for. It's a VR AR headset that no one wants. Actually no one wants a VR AR hybrid headset they want to be able to play games, the one thing that's terrible at because it doesn't have a controller.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I doubt these engineers have been moved to this project unless there’s some technology overlap. Apple Vision is still in development and there’s a reduced complexity/reduced cost version to be worked on.
Nah fuck that.
Please no.