this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
102 points (92.5% liked)

Apple

16911 readers
84 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmoNova 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Continuing the trend of not being innovative ever since Jobs' passing.

[–] phoneymouse 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Apple Watch was not innovative? Apple Silicon was not innovative? Vision Pro was not innovative?

Look at you, all entitled to Apple’s innovation.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

People have a tendency to only equate the word “innovation” with “woooaahh, completely new in my face never before seen tech that seemingly came out of nowhere!”. When in reality innovation is almost always slow, small, incremental steps.

So when Apple introduces something to their lineup, many deride it as not being innovative, even though it is often the first version of something that is fairly solid, reliable, and useable.

People think they want mind-blowing technological jumps, but in practice they rarely accept/adopt new technology (or really, anything too outside of the norm, tech or not).

[–] reddig33 -2 points 3 months ago

Pretty sure Apple Watch was already in progress when Steve was alive.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Apple just wait until something already exists and then make a more expensive version of it that's not innovation. I'm not saying that something like the vision pro isn't a good product but it's not groundbreaking in any way.

As demonstrated by the fact that Apple made it without any real idea of what it was actually for. It's a VR AR headset that no one wants. Actually no one wants a VR AR hybrid headset they want to be able to play games, the one thing that's terrible at because it doesn't have a controller.