That white box seems waaaay too big to me.
Data is Beautiful
A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.
DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.
A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.
A post must be (or contain) a qualifying data visualization.
Directly link to the original source article of the visualization
Original source article doesn't mean the original source image. Link to the full page of the source article as a link-type submission.
If you made the visualization yourself, tag it as [OC]
[OC] posts must state the data source(s) and tool(s) used in the first top-level comment on their submission.
DO NOT claim "[OC]" for diagrams that are not yours.
All diagrams must have at least one computer generated element.
No reposts of popular posts within 1 month.
Post titles must describe the data plainly without using sensationalized headlines. Clickbait posts will be removed.
Posts involving American Politics, or contentious topics in American media, are permissible only on Thursdays (ET).
Posts involving Personal Data are permissible only on Mondays (ET).
Please read through our FAQ if you are new to posting on DataIsBeautiful. Commenting Rules
Don't be intentionally rude, ever.
Comments should be constructive and related to the visual presented. Special attention is given to root-level comments.
Short comments and low effort replies are automatically removed.
Hate Speech and dogwhistling are not tolerated and will result in an immediate ban.
Personal attacks and rabble-rousing will be removed.
Moderators reserve discretion when issuing bans for inappropriate comments. Bans are also subject to you forfeiting all of your comments in this community.
Originally r/DataisBeautiful
I thought so too, but its log scale, so who knows.
Also remember that the longest distance you've ever traveled is an unknown quantity but guaranteed to be huge, since the earth itself is careening through space
Maybe it counts what we’ve explored via telescopes? Like, JWST can look far back at specific things and all-sky surveys only look so far.
The logiest of scales
With only two numbers written down we technically don't know whether it's linear or log
Couldn't one figure it out based on the box being signed slightly to the left of and above center?
I mean yeah, with prior knowledge of/ intuition for the data. Which in general shouldn't be presumed when presenting a graph. But I'm being nit picky
That’s not being nit picky at all in my opinion. The chart is objectively terrible. I’d be Reviewer Number 2 on this one.
If its linear the Human Experience is located around -5*10^22s - -3*10^22s and 3*10^25m - 6*10^25m (whatever that would even be supposed to mean).
Doesnt seem right to me. But yes, technically youre right
I was expecting something a little more circular, tbh.
So a box means that the duration of time doesn't affect the lengths we can perceive, and the sizes don't affect the duration of time we can observe something.
A circle would imply that the amount of time we perceive something affects the scales we can perceive, and most weirdly of all, vice-versa.
The circle sounds like a really interesting—if mind-bending—science fiction book. If it was written well enough I'd give it a shot, even if I can't intuit what's going on.
Like the dot of the i of Jeremy Bearimy?
I was thinking maybe donut-shaped
But don't we all want to experience 10^26 m?
JWST has some pictures of it
Some are looking at 10^-15 for the answers too
B-b-but, surely things so small or far away could never impact us!? (/s :-P)
i’ll take this over the universe cone thing