this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
435 points (93.4% liked)

memes

10326 readers
1671 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's almost like one is something they agree on and the other isn't!

[–] agitatedpotato 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

You see how that's a problem that the government cant agree on making things better for people but can agree on ban something millions enjoy so their donors can have more control over the data of that thing right?

Its not exactly a great example of democracy when we can't raise wages when the price of groceries is rapidly increasing but we can ban apps where kids make 15 second clips of them dancing.

[–] AnyProgressIsGood 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Well when half the population votes against itself that's what you get

[–] thesporkeffect 2 points 8 months ago

Gerrymandering

[–] Cryophilia 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Man, have you ever noticed how when Democrats do something bad (or fail to do something good) the Democrats get called out? But when Republicans do something bad, we use these veiled phrases like "the government can't agree" or "part of the population votes against itself"?

We avoid saying "the Republicans are fucking us over". I wonder why that is.

[–] JJROKCZ 1 points 8 months ago

They don’t care about kids dancing, they care that the platform allows people to be critical of the government and the right-wing rhetoric that is so pervasive in the American platforms doesn’t really exist on TikTok. You could call that due to Chinese influence or due to the community rejecting it but either way, the American government has been moving right for decades and does t like getting called out on it.

On the other hand I get the governments concern that a foreign adversary has access to so much data on American citizens and could have undue influence on American culture by adjusting the algorithms and making their own targeted content that looks benign and natural

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

No, they're both things they agree on; banning competition of and decreasing labor costs for their campaign donors.

[–] JusticeForPorygon 16 points 8 months ago

bUwT tHaWt WoUwD cAwSe InFwAtIoN

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

mark zuckerberg influenced congress to make a move on tiktok, because it's fast growing competition that cannot currently be invested in (no hedge).