this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
19 points (88.0% liked)

Star Trek

1229 readers
2 users here now

/c/StarTrek: Your safe harbored Spacedock in these Stellar Seas!

Fire up the inertial dampeners, retract all moorings and clear space dock. It's time to boldy go where no one has gone before!

~ 1. Be Civil. This is a Star Trek community and lets keep that energy. Be kind, respectful and polite to one another.

~ 2. Be Courteous. Please use the spoiler tags for any new Trek content that's been released in the past month. Check this page for lemmy formatting) for any posts. Also please keep spoilers out of the titles!

~ 3. Be Considerate. We're spread out across a lot of different instances but don't forget to follow your instances rules and the instance rules for Lemmy.world.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source: https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/star-trek-movies-from-1979-to-2016-domestic-box-office-actual-and-adjusted-for-inflation.306345/

I find it fascinating that the cheaper the movie was to make, the better it did at the box office. The Kelvin movies leaned heavily on the CGI trap, and it doesn't seem to have worked.

What should Trek movies of the future do differently? What did the old movies do so well? What did the newer movies do wrong? (and vice versa).

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My god, that budget on Wrath of Khan is so small compared to how well it was received!

[–] negativenull 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That shocked me too!

I'm also shocked at how badly Nemesis did.

[–] grue 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I’m also shocked at how badly Nemesis did.

[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 10 months ago

That said, TMP was bound to do better than the other TOS films just by virtue of being the first new Star Trek in years.

[–] chuckleslord 4 points 10 months ago

The budgets weren't adjusted for inflation. This says nothing about some trend with the Kelvin movies because of that fact.