this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
272 points (90.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43958 readers
1316 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seeing a big “politics” community in both lemmy.ml and lemmy.world just confuses me as to which I should be subscribing to and I don’t really want to subscribe to both.

Guess this is just a downside of federated instances? There’ll never just be one “/r/politics” on Lemmy?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TeaHands 123 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Honestly, I can see why some people find it annoying but in my experience so far it's been fine. Do a sweep on lemmyverse, sub to all the communities around a given topic, never really think about which one it actually came from when I see a post in my feed.

There are some quite niche topics that have been unnecessarily split, essentially just because people want to be in charge rather than joining forces, but that's people for you and railing about it isn't gonna get us anywhere. From an end-user pov, subscribing to multiple has been fine.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

TMW you realize there's no downside to joining multiple communities for the same topic, even if they have the same name.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imo there is, but it's solvable. Personally, I almost always browse specific communities/subs and almost never scroll through my home feed. So multiple communities is annoying because it means jumping between each one on the list. Could be solved though, by just implementing a Lemmy equivalent to multireddits.

[–] TeaHands 12 points 1 year ago

It's probably the number one feature request so if it doesn't get put into the core Lemmy UI it'll almost certainly be implemented by third party apps soon enough. Will definitely be useful, and fun for people like me who enjoy organising things into lists!

[–] TeaHands 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah it's natural to be a bit wary I think just because we're not used to things working that way. Took me a little bit as well but I've been here for over a month now so settled into it nicely.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From a different end-user POV, seeing the same stuff repeated is not fun. I would prefer to see everything once instead of choosing between seeing almost everything twice(subscribed to both) or missing a little bit(subscribed to one, blocked the other).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is why the decentralized approach is great. If mods get their heads too power swollen, one can form their own community and even on their own server if they wish. The approach lessens the potential for abuse.

[–] trouser_mouse 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Totally agree - it's a wonderful freedom, but it also means as happened with Android recently that a large community can be closed down and redirected and there isn't a policy to transfer or reclaim the space if it is locked by the one person who owns it. Not a huge issue now, but come the point large companies are moving to the space it could well get quite messy!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Seems like this is probably the answer. We don’t need to not looking for a 1 to 1 replacement for Reddit and the variation we see in communities could end up bringing some vibrancy and more differing opinions on things around here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ritswd 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly. And if one of them ends up sucking for any reason, you can drop it and be very glad that there were several. That’s very much the point.

I want to make sure people have a good experience here, but on this one, I really don’t get what people find so difficult about it…

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I strongly prefer it.

It's a much more organic reflection of older systems. It used to be that there were local newspapers, national ones, and international ones. I want the same thing with my memes. I want a place I go to see what the hot movies and games across the world, and another where discussions are mostly people in my geography or who share a common set of tastes with me.

This idea that the internet should flatten the world into one monoculture has been, in my opinion, both naive and destructive to a lot of tastes that don't align with the dominant tastemakers.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reddit has multiple repeat communities too, they just have different names. Just to take one example, there's /r/Canada, which got taken over by right wing assholes, /r/metacanada for those same right wing assholes to go full mask off, /r/onguardforthee for the people who didn't want to put up with the right wing assholes... You get the picture.

The fact that there are multiple overlapping communities with similar purposes can be frustrating, but it also provides layers of redundancy, which is what the fediverse is all about. We've been learning a lot of object lessons recently about the problems of putting all your eggs in one basket.

[–] nemesis_aorta 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is currently a pending feature request to add a feature dubbed “multireddit” that communities can add themselves to and where the end user would only have to sub to one multireddit to have access to all the communities with the same on multiple servers. It seems to be opt-in for communities, though, which is good IMO.

[–] odbod 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This sounds like a great idea; all the benefits and there's no obvious downside.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not really. I usually just check the subscriber count and pick the larger one. Unless if they’re about the same, then I’ll sub to both. Just means I’ll see more content. Might be a bit of overlap sometimes, but not always.

[–] thawed_caveman 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And if everyone does that, eventually there will be a main community that emerges and the other ones die.

[–] Kilamaos 9 points 1 year ago

Exactly why federated social medias instances aren't necessarily a solution to centralized ones. Meta's stuff his being preemptively blocked, but it's bound to happen eventually.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wolfylow 30 points 1 year ago

Why not subscribe to them all? Content will still appear on your home feed …

There were a bunch of subreddits I was subbed to on Reddit that were effectively the same thing, even if they had different names.

[–] JerkyIsSuperior 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Once again, this is a feature, not a bug. Two different servers, two different communities, united by a common communication protocol. This is what separates Lemmy from other Reddit clones, and what made it thrive, unlike non-federated sites who are either splintered and languishing, or attracting an unsavory audience.

[–] trouser_mouse 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're right but the other side of that is various instances seem to feel the need to address it and ask not to create duplicates in guides, which makes it feel like maybe there is an argument that the feature is not always a benefit in some scenarios.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I don't like it as well. People have to realize that Lemmy needs active members who are NOT part of the Nerd/tech bubble because they bring in a other type of content. I don't know enough about the feediverse protocols to know wether it's possible but what would help is if there where something like grouped communities consisting of multiple communities which are all about the same topic. Then you could search for e.g. "Cats" and it's shows you this grouped community which subscribes you to all cat content. I know that there are web based tools which already do a similar thing for a transfer from Reddit to Lemmy but those Groups would have to be integrated into Lemmy itself to be user friendly.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This seems to be a big issue with the general fediverse community attitude to me. It reminds me a lot of the Linux community 10+ years ago, constantly downplaying some pretty huge technical hurdles that new people need to climb, and then wondering why it struggle so much to gain traction.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JerkyIsSuperior 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I really don't understand the hostility towards nerd/tech oriented communities. Every time an online community dares to be on the nerdy side you get people loudly proclaiming how that's the worst thing ever, and that we need to expand until every Tom, Dick and Harry has a user acount.

Usually, when a site is adopted by the general public, the quality of the posted content goes down the toilet. Bots, shills and intrusive advertising follows, and the site dies a slow death. Reddit's r/all was a museum of ragebait, reposts and celebrity gossip, and I certainly don't want Lemmy to do an enshittification speedrun because some users refuse to learn how the fediverse functions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] turbakker 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm just curious, what is the harm in subscribing to both for a little bit? If you feel they post similar content you can always drop one of them. Or if one ends up 'winning' then the problem is solved.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is that while subscribed you see the popular posts twice. All of them. Sometimes even literally one after the other in the feed lol

Right now we just choose between seeing almost everything twice (sub to both) or missing a little (sub to only one).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deweydecibel 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I'd like to point out what just happened to [email protected].

It was closed and migrated to another instance explicitly to keep things from being "spread out".

It also happens that the instance it was moved to has extremely overbearing moderation that effectively prevents actual discussion. It's so "curated" that everything is segregated into hyper specific feeds, everything except "official" news is removed, and no one is contributing because of the overbearing rules (no questions, no memes, no "rants" i.e. don't make opinion posts).

It's controlled by the "experienced" moderation team from /r/Android, that subreddit that would get like one or two posts a day that weren't removed. It was strangled. We are supposed to defer to it this "experienced" team, hence why the lemmy.world instance has been locked. Now that instance sits pretty as having thousands of subscribers, and that will hurt the growth of smaller android groups because people gravitate towards the biggest ones and the second biggest one on lemmy.world is locked.

In essence, forced centralization. This is exactly what federation was supposed to prevent. Subverted in less than a two weeks since those communities formed.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I think in that case the "forced" centralisation is purely constructed. There are no mechanisms preventing somebody from creating an android community in their own instance and federating it with lemmy.world. Even if [email protected] is permanently locked, that fact isn't really a barrier to entry for another android community to pop up, just that that community was able to establish a subscriber base over time but I don't see why another android community couldn't do the same given some time, especially if the available android communities at the moment are locked and restricted.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm curious, what's your concern with subscribing to both? I had the same thought when I switched and then thought "is this just a knee jerk reaction? I can't think of a decent reason why it's that annoying when they both appear in my subs feed anyway"

I'm interested to hear why others might not like it as that might be what I'm thinking without realising.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The major concern is whether to cross-post so that members of only one community can see posts from the other, or to avoid cross posts so that people subscribed to both don't see duplicates

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

The upside of this is that if you don't like how a particular community is being moderated, you can follow a different community about the same topic

[–] Uncandy1 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This might have to come from the app developers. The app is the one pulling from different instances so they will have to be the one that combines things from all over into one feed

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Love this idea - can definitely imagine merging communities with the same name being a clean solution.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues/1113

Once this lands it'll be all the positives and none of the downsides, so, meh.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's more annoying to me is the few users spamming every instance non stop with "engagement" content. Like dang bro chill this isn't about karma.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

It just feels like forums of old to me

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

I found out quickly that the instance matters. California at exploding-heads is not the same thing as my California, and they won't be talking about fun hikes to do on the weekend over there.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t think it’s bad, every instance has slightly different moderation rules. Reddit also has multiple variations of one subreddit, like offmychest and trueoffmychest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sparr 8 points 1 year ago

I expect most clients, including the official web client, to have "meta-community" support soon, which will include the ability to meta together communities with the same name on different instances.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

If one sucks we can just hop to the other one. I like it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Actually, I kind of like this aspect. I digress ... yes, there will just never be one !politics because this is the feature of the fediverse. The idea is that, should you get banned from a community for politely expressing even slight disagreement, there could be a community on a different instance for you to join or you could form your own . Sometimes mods can be heavy handed and the decentralized approach to Lemmy helps to lessen speech being stifled. Some people get some mod power and it goes to their head.

[–] pyromaster55 7 points 1 year ago

Remember lemmy is in it's infancy still compared to reddit. I imagine as lemmy grows certain communities will end up being the more populated ones, and they will kind of become the default. The downside is that that will take time, the upside is there is always an alternative if something goes wrong.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

It's okay for general topics like politics, news, ecc but for specific ones is just a waste to have multiple communities. Eventually, with more people joining lemmy, only one community per topic will prevail, I hope.

[–] fidodo 6 points 1 year ago

That is inherent with the decentralized nature of instances. Hopefully with all the new dev attention we'll get community grouping and account linking to make it a bit another. But if you don't like the power consolidation from centralized systems this is the solution, warts and all.

[–] ghariksforge 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I like it.

One big problem with Reddit was that subreddits became personal fiefdoms of the mods that have captured them. If the same happens here, we can simply move to the same community in another server.

Fragmentation is good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Instances are like countries that have their own values and rules. For example, [email protected] will not be the same as [email protected]. Beehaw is a heavily moderated instance, while Lemmy.world is more “free”. What can be posted on [email protected] will not necessarily be the case on [email protected].

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Reddit had duped of everything too. I’d rather subscribe to both and move my thumb a quarter centimeter to scroll past a dupe. I can deal with that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes it is. But that doesn’t mean we should congeal onto one. Instead I’d strongly prefer clients being able to merge multiple communities into one feed. That way, if a node “drops” (defederated, closes, technical issue etc) the congealation (I’d like that to be the word, please) would still survive.

Discovery services could then be built around popular congealations.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›