this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)

California

1537 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to /c/California, an online haven that brings to life the unrivaled diversity and vibrancy of California! This engaging community offers a virtual exploration of the Golden State, taking you from the stunning Pacific coastline to the rugged Sierra Nevada, and every town, city, and landmark in between. Discover California's world-class wineries, stunning national parks, innovative tech scene, robust agricultural heartland, and culturally diverse metropolises.

Discussions span a wide range of topics—from travel tips and restaurant recommendations to local politics and environmental issues. Whether you're a lifelong resident, a recent transplant, or planning your dream visit, /c/California is your one-stop place to share experiences, ask questions, and celebrate all the things that make California truly unique.

Related Communities:

Nearby Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived copies of the article: web.archive.org ghostarchive.org archive.today

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They want to reinvest into rolling out FttH that they were given massive subsidies to build, right? Right?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

AT&T described landline service as duplicative to its wireless and fiber-based internet offerings that the company says it could expand faster if it did not have to expend money and resources to support landlines.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 10 points 1 year ago

That fiber that's two blocks away, has been for ten years, but they have no interest in bringing over because we don't pay them enough

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Ah, I am sure they will just allow the public to determine what to do with this useful but unused infrastructure.

No? They own it? And you can't use it without forking over I dunno, 10 billion dollars to buy it from them?

Hrm.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm conflicted. On one hand, bye.

On the other hand, I can see the use cases of keeping it. Like bad cell reception and reliability.

But their example is really bad --

Oakland senior Carla Vinciguerra lives in a three-story home with a landline on each floor. If she suffered a medical emergency, and her cell phone were on a different floor, she could possibly crawl to a landline, she said, but without that option, she would have no way to summon help

Like damn, if that's the issue, carry your phone on your persons everywhere.

[–] n0clue 5 points 1 year ago

Don't live in a three-story home at that point either?

[–] notannpc 3 points 1 year ago

I bet you if they get their wish their next fiscal year will involve recording breaking profits instead of using that cost of maintenance to expand other services like they’re pretending they’ll do.

[–] Snapz 3 points 1 year ago

Every single thing has to be infinitely profitable

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Landlines serve no ‘valid public purpose,’ AT&T says

I never thought I would wind up agreeing with AT&T

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Large parts of the Bay Area mountains don't have cell service

[–] mesamunefire 3 points 1 year ago

Quite a bit of the central valley and mountains too.