this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
3643 points (98.5% liked)

Fediverse

28724 readers
116 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lemmy.ml has now blocked Threads.net

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iturnedintoanewt 278 points 1 year ago (26 children)
[–] antik 2 points 1 year ago

You can read the lemmy.world admin response here

[–] antik 1 points 1 year ago

You can read the lemmy.world admin response here

[–] necrxfagivs 267 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (27 children)

The admins stated on Mastodon that they're not going to defederate until something happens. Knowing Meta they shouldn't give them the chance.

Here's the link: https://mastodon.world/@mwadmin/110654590632768079

[–] antik 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can read the lemmy.world admin response here

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sanctus 243 points 1 year ago (28 children)

Thats unfortunate. I'll be moving instances then. Giving Meta a chance is a lot like giving a mosquito a chance to not suck your blood.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] [email protected] 112 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"until something happens"

I suppose Metas history of actively being a bad actor working against societies best interests and enabling hate groups doesn't qualify as 'something'...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] trifictional 77 points 1 year ago (42 children)

Oh, looks like I’m switching instances.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

And done. I love federation.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (41 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] tox_solid 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Be a lot cooler if they did.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Lenins2ndCat 261 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (80 children)

This is not particularly surprising. Lemmy was started as an anti-corporate project by leftists after /r/chapotraphouse got quarantined and later banned (subreddit for the most popular podcast and most donated patreon at the time), with the explicit goal of preventing corporate control from being able to silence leftists when they're blasting off. CTH was skyrocketing in subscribers at the time it was quarantined on August 8th 2019, and when even quarantining didn't stop its growth or slow down its activity afterwards Reddit pulled the plug under the excuse it promoted violence, but the only particularly edgy thing ever said there was "slave owners should be killed" and support for John Brown. This evolved post-ban into the assessment that Spez banned it because he wants to own slaves.

When that happened there was a massive shift in the leftist parts of reddit as we very quickly realised we'd be targeted if reddit ever deemed us to be too successful, and projects like Lemmy began in reaction. CTH's community in fact moved to Lemmy 3 years ago, and resides on Hexbear.net but has not yet joined the rest of federated lemmy due to technical issues (it used to be a fork with a different front end).

Given lemmy's specific anti-corporate origins seeing Lemmy.ml do this should surprise nobody. It's the correct move anyway.

[–] Nobody 109 points 1 year ago (41 children)

Always love to hear the deep lore. Lemmy’s early development makes a lot more sense now. Good on them(you) to leave everything open and learn from Reddit’s mistakes.

Still, free and open has a limit. No Facebook and no Nazis. That’s just common sense everyone used to have.

load more comments (41 replies)
load more comments (79 replies)
[–] KeefChief13 242 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Lemmy.world needs to follow

[–] antik 1 points 1 year ago

You can read the lemmy.world admin response here

[–] Rusticus 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Completely agree - If lemmy.world doesn't block very shortly I will move to a different instance.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ulu_mulu 187 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Fantastic news! Can we please do the same on lemmy.world? Please?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Rooki 162 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It would be even greater if lemmy.world does it ;)

[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Make a poll, let the admins realize that their users don't want to federate with Meta.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] answersplease77 132 points 1 year ago (4 children)

lemmy.world and everyone should as well

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gamers_Mate 111 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (25 children)

I am proud of Lemmy.ml for defederating. The second I find out if kbin social or lemmy world defederate or not I will just move to the other one since I use both. (Edit turns out Lemmy.ml is run by Tankies and also allows federation with lemmygrad.)

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] ImperialATAT 105 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Looking forward to Lemmy.world pushing the block button when it comes to it…

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] seperis 103 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Hard agree.

I don't really think federating with them is doomsday, tbh (though I go back and forth on this one), but that doesn't affect my primary reason for my nope. Threads consolidates everything I hate about corporate social media--and for that matter, all social media--without a single part I actually liked and made dealing with the other parts worth it. This is not a twitter clone; it's like someone asked chatGPT to create a social media network based on twitter for other chatGPT bots to talk to each other. For fuck's sake, it doesn't think its users should control what they see on their own feed.

I am perfectly willing--even eager--to perform melodramatically about things that annoy me in public for fun and when I'm bored and applaud others doing the same; it's fun times for all and possibly my favorite thing ever. This is not that.

Threads makes my skin crawl on concept. This is not 'they do not align with our values' because come on, Fediverse contains a multitude of values and invents more and i bet if asked, everyone here would list off a different set of values they believe encompass Fediverse and now I'm tempted to see because it would be hilarious. But we can't even get that far; Threads has no values. This would be a marriage of convenience to a real doll fueled by Facebook's algorithms and sponsored by Wal-Mart; whether or not it's a danger to Fediverse shouldn't even have come up because the first question that should be on anyone's minds is 'wait, this is actually a serious question?' and have been answered 'lol of course it's a joke, I just forgot to add the /s'.

I'm still waiting for that /s.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] fross 99 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

It's not about Zuckerberg, it's about the userbase. With something that grew to 30 million users literally overnight, it's impossible to determine what it will be like, and how it will mesh with the existing fediverse content/users.

With something this scale, it only makes sense to secure and observe - pre-emptively block, watch the content, maybe even poll the users on what should be done. There is nothing to be lost this way, it's only a cautious approach towards a potential later link.

What could be lost is the Threads community overwhelms the lemmy community before there is a chance to react (it is 1000x bigger, after all). It makes sense to be cautious, here.

This isn't inconveniencing anyone, any user can make an account on Threads as well and use both right now.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] nyternic 90 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look, Mark has royally screwed up Facebook. Any respect or honor with the guy has long been lost. Why even give him a second chance when it's obvious he's going to do the same thing with Threads?

His Metaverse failed. His Facebook/Meta thing failed.

He is a huge red alert to be involved or close to the very things we're trying to recover and escape to from things he has contaminated. Why chance associating with him?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LazyBane 88 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Ideologically, de-federating an instance just because you don't like the guy running it would be a bad thing, but Facebook/Meta has been just so toxic to the internet as a whole it's hard to really find fault with it.

[–] WiseassWolfOfYoitsu 39 points 1 year ago

My concern is less Suckerburg as much as Meta's corporate history. My expectation is that they'll try to use this to conquer and destroy Lemmy.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago (14 children)

I’m actually shocked by the growth of threads, I underestimated how much people don’t care about their digital privacy.

[–] ShakeThatYam 71 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You are using a social network on some random dude's server.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago

That is very true, but I have a little more trust in this random dude’s server where he gets access to what? He sees my IP address? Than a corp that collects an unnecessary amount of user info for the sole purpose of keeping you locked into their apps with little disregard for health. While also pimping your info out to any persons with $2 to their name.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] woelkchen 39 points 1 year ago

Those are existing Instagram accounts.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Gerula 64 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Bravo lemmy.ml! We should follow the example!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] vvvvv 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I don't know. I would like to subscribe to someone on Threads from Mastodon (since both are Twitter alternatives), if they don't have Mastodon account (which let's be honest they probably don't). Zuck does not get any of my data (besides what's available publicly anyway). If Threads decides to go full EEE, I'll stop getting updates from people on Threads, same as I don't get updates from people on IG right now. I think proliferation of ActivityPub protocol would be the greatest advantage.

Moreover, I think we should follow the email architecture - I might use i.e. Proton Mail, but it does not prevent me from sending emails to Gmail, which I think is a bad provider, who collects a lot of user data. In fact if Proton Mail forbade sending email to Gmail I would be really displeased about that.

The goal is to allow people to choose where they want to go and ActivityPub is what can help with that, unlike blocking Threads.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sunforged 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Waiting for others to follow.

[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 year ago (8 children)

They'll be devastated when they find out my closed instance with 2 users, 1 of which is inactive, also pre-emptively de-federated them. I shudder to think they'll ever recover.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] granglle 53 points 1 year ago

Very good news. Between Pi Hole and uBlock Origin, any links to threads is already blocked on my computer. Nice to see you folks preventing the linking to this privacy invading boil of the internet

[–] muaveri 53 points 1 year ago

how about making a poll on lemmy.world asking how we feel about defederating from metatrap, just to see...

[–] downpunxx 50 points 1 year ago (13 children)

When companies like META show you how ruinous they are the first dozen times, over and over without end, you believe them, and you defend yourself, or you deserve every bad thing that's going to happen to you, when they repeat their corporate driven ends at your expense

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] joerocca 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

I'm on the fence here. Luckily, at least, I think community/subreddit-based sites like Lemmy/Reddit don't have "network effects" that are as "sticky" as Mastodon/Twitter, because with Lemmy/Reddit you don't need to build up a follower list to start getting value. You just join the community and it's as if you immediately "followed" a bunch of people who share your interests. You don't even need to make an account - you can just bookmark a community and lurk, and maybe you eventually make an account to start interacting. It's a great "on-ramp" - very low barrier to entry/usefulness.

I think that's why Lemmy was able to take off so fast. It relies on community-level coordination, rather than every individual user having to make their own choice to switch, and try to get all their followers/followees to switch. So even if Meta did add a community-style mode, I don't think it'd eat into the Lemmy userbase. It is hard to be sure though, and I respect the choices of those instances that have blocked/defederated.

Mastodon admins have a harder decision to make I think - there's an opportunity to get very quick growth by effectively adding a lot more followable users/content. A bunch of people don't like Meta/Facebook, but want to follow their friends, and so they may use Mastodon to do that, which could get a lot more people to move to "real" fediverse apps/sites like Mastodon. I know a lot of people that are on Threads now, and I'm looking forward to being able to follow them from Mastodon, rather than being forced to get Threads to keep up to date with what they're working on.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lemm.ee intends to do the same “If Threads ever becomes interoperable with Lemmy”

Per – Admin Post

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›