Just pass in the name of a json file as a CLI input (or default the name and act on it if present or use it if indicated [e.g. /U == use json.config]).
Programming
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]
I will definitely make that an option, but I would still want it to be invokable via CLI only if the user chooses. It makes scripting easier sometimes.
How about a command-line flag to name an input file, but also process input as JSON, so someone can pipe it to your command or hand-write it if they're crazy?
Yea, as a user I'd second the use of a configuration file - that approach tends to be much more convenient to use... especially since most users won't often change these values.
perhaps also useful in this case to document the shortcut of
<(echo ‘{…}’)
since not many people know about it, and it makes your tool work with things specified entirely on the command line rather than temp files
alternatively —config-file and —config-json or similar
making and cleaning up temp files when writing scripts is just such a massive PITA
If the json payload is small with finite keys you can support separate args for those keys. If you really need arbitrary json what you have described is fairly reasonable as a shorthand, similar to AWS CLI shorthand.
Honestly passing optional/advanced args as json via CLI isn't usually too bad since you can quote it with single quotes.
Can't this all be deduced from the URI?
The .git suffix indicates git, the project name is the stem (project).
Nix does something like this with the protocol specifier: e.g. git+https://...
I'm not sure what name
means here exactly, but it might make sense to treat that separately, like git remotes:
tool add [name] git+https://foo
That is assuming it's hosted on github.
That is an example URI.
Ok, then I don't understand at all. What happens if I host my git project on https://myawesomeproject.dev/
? How can the application infer anything by this URL?
Then replace "github.com" with "myawesomeproject.dev". There's more to the URI than just the hostname.
But you can't assume that it follows the github format of https:////.git
. In my example, I meant that you would just use that url to clone it:
git clone https://myawesomeproject.dev
One real-world example of this is ziglings.org (though it's technically just a redirect).
That's not a GitHub format; it's a git format.
No, it isn't. Git doesn't care what the url is, as long as it uses a supported transport protocol.
For something like that i'd take a parameter like this (repeated as necessary):
--custom-repo==+
for example:
--custom-repo=custom=git+https://github.com/matcha/custom
What language? This would be simple with Python's argparse or Go's pflag.
I'm having the same problem. this kind of nested argument is quite annoying to program in e.g. argp. i am even thinking of using a minimal forth like parser to do this.
command --git-url https://... --alias myalias --svn-url http://... --alias mysvnalias
You may process it as a stack.
When reading within the program from stdin I recommend a state machine.
Ask the user to customize a preset.json?
That is certainly one solution and I plan to make that an option. But I'd still like to make the program invokable without having to write a file.
command --custom-repo-uri https://foo.com --custom-repo-name repo_name --custom-repo-sync-type git
There could be multiple custom repos, so it would be difficult to know which uri goes with which repo name, and so on.