Anyone initially read this as “orphan crushing”?
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
99 points (99.0% liked)
Uplifting News
11490 readers
172 users here now
Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.
Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I read it accurately as urchin crushing, but still thought they were talking about destitute children at first (a la Oliver Twist).
I was about to get all political with it too … as the theme of one of the political parties in the US
🙋🏻
I straight up thought we were crushing them with kelp. Which my first two thoughts were; why that is a terrible thing to do and I am sure there is a better way to crush them than kelp.
Fucking brains they are an odd thing.
You don’t have to crush sea urchins. You can eat them! And they’re delicious!
I'm betting you didn't read the article
I mean, this is lemmy.
But also, yeah, I didn’t realize they were actually so pervasive that they’ve destroyed 96% of the kelp forests in that area.
And they are also eating them, but specify these urchins specifically have less roe and other edible parts, so they are basically more trouble than they're worth to eat
Sea urchins as a food source was addressed in the article:
Red urchins are favored over the purple urchins because they contain more edible uni or roe inside, but commercial divers say the amount has shrunk with less kelp.
Chefs have started serving purple urchins to build a market.