If you get it right you're a robot!
this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
926 points (98.3% liked)
Programmer Humor
32483 readers
269 users here now
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
welcome to the secret robot internet
When AI gets so cheap that it starts understanding any captcha challenge, we might be able to honey pot them like this for a while
Is it all of them?
I don't think the Spartan 6 can, it's an fpga with no arm, the zynq can, there's a lot of other arm chips that I assume can run some type of Linux, but the blurry ones are throwing me off
Edit, top left is a 286 CPU, and the Intel one has an earlier date, so they MIGHT be able to ~~run~~walk it, it'll be not good
Not only could mainline Linux never run on a 286, it also definitely doesn't count as an "SoC" to begin with. It needed a separate co-processor just to do floating-point math, let alone to manage all the I/O that a SoC does on-die.
You guys are the best. I reply in what I think is a bit nerdy way, and I'm outdone.
It needed a separate co-processor
Such a great time to be alive. 🥲
286 Protected Mode is very different from 386 PM and there is no way Linux will would run on it.
There is a project looking to do this kind of, known as elks that has images for 80286 chips. I have no idea why you’d want to do that to yourself though.
Interesting. Reminds me of PC/IX, and it probably similarly doesn't even enter pm, judging from it running also on an 8086.
this is extra tricky because they did not specify the exact kernel. mainline could be any of the kernels tagged as stable that you can build from linus' git tree. i know that in the past you could run a mainline linux on intel 368 chips but today you probably can not because official support was dropped a while ago.
Part of me wishes I still had my families old 386 or commodore knock-off. Read some of the terrible short stories I wrote, play tanks. I remember when my Mom's friend came over with a stack of 5~1/4~ floppies and installed a program that played the Loonie Toons theme song with their logo and Buggs Bunny captioned saying "That's all folks." It blew my mind, video (sort of) on a computer, how was that even possible. I wondered how they got it to connect to the cable cause no way a computer could do that. Dang I'm getting old lol.
If posted in the right circles, this might motivate someone to get something on a Spartan 6 that runs Linux.
Damn .. https://numato.com/kb/saturn-microblaze-and-linux-how-run-linux-saturn-spartan-6-fpga-module-part-i/ I was hoping to find a comment, maybe, not a complete guide.
Also, didn't know that you could run it in a microblaze instance
Linux 🤝 DooM
Running on literally fucking anything
Doom runs without MMU or even MPU. Maybe can run even without context switching.
You can run a "soft" (semi-hard?) Processor on a Spartan, you could run Linux on that at least.
I guess the blurry Samsung in the center is an ARM?
it's an fpga with no arm
You can make arm in fpga. Or more realistically RISC-V.
I just go by the colour - I don't like the slightly maroon Qualcomm one.
It's like picking politicians but different - with then I go by their haircuts...
With enough grit and time, yes :D
Edit: ok not mainline, but Linux in some form or another anyway.
load more comments
(1 replies)
What’s the test here? Prove you’re an embedded systems nerd?
The follow up question is what chip can run Doom.
The one after that is just a panel of sixteen shoes, "Which of these can run a JVM?"
Depends what JVM I can beat with the shoe
The opposite of a captcha. Making sure that ONLY bots can enter.
This is gold
It's mostly silicon.
I guess I set myself up for that one...
OH MAN. I worked on an Android tablet that used a rockchip CPU, not the one listed here but an older one (I think RK3026). What a PIECE OF SHIT. I don't wish that tablet on my worst enemy. Battery life was like sub 2 hours with a 3200 mAh battery. Sometimes it would start running hot, and you could watch the batter percentage go down one percent every 10-20 seconds. The only way to break it out was to reboot it or let it die.
We later upgraded our CPU to the 3288, one gen older than this one, and it was significantly improved, but still very entry level.
Anything that's turning complete, has enough ram, and has a c compiler can run Linux. Theoretically, you could program a CPLD to run brainfuck and you could still run Linux.
The mainline part is key.
Yes. Any turing complete processor can perfectly emulate any other turing complete processor, whether it is x86, arm, or riscv. Mainline Linux can then run on this emulated processor without modification.
Damn that's gonna be slow.
But I guess speed was not a criterion.
It's technically correct, the best kind of correct.
I guess it's the difference of can today vs could if this emulator existed...
"boot" is the next important part. Have you tried reading it in full?
load more comments
(7 replies)
...and lack of "theory".
Not on the Harris, Qualcomm and Broadcom ones, those are modems. The Mediatek and TI Omap one I have no idea about. The SCEI one can only run YellowDog due to it being a PowerPC architecture.
Yellow Dog, there’s a name I haven’t heard in a while. Unfortunately it’s now long dead.
Debian at least still maintains a PPC version.
That was a neat read, had never heard of it before. Yeah, besides like obviously IBM OSs and Debian I didn't know anything else that had power support.
There's various exotic platforms that supported PPC, like some the Amiga derived OSs like AmigaOS 4, MorphOS, AROS etc. BeOS also keenly supported PPC.
Even Windows NT had a PPC version for a while.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I remember this captcha. I gave up after about the fourth round. The prize just wasn't worth it, and I wasn't on a machine where I could try scripting out a solution.
What LPI Exam is this
Lmao
view more: next ›