this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
11 points (76.2% liked)

Australia

3620 readers
205 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Dunno what happened with that other user’s post, but I figured I’d post the correct article for them. Not really the sort of article I’d usually post or even read.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rabiddolphin 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Shouldn't be any royalty in 2024

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Only Aussie royals I support are our little boob shaped chocolate treats Arnott’s Royals.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Damn it. Cannot unsee.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Yay, the first Australian head of state!

[–] quitenormal 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm just wondering if we could substitute our current monarchy for the Danish one. Maybe if a Danish naval officer lands at Sydney Cove and plants a flag there? This has a precedent I believe.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I was only somewhat joking when, a week or so ago, I suggested that that switching to the Danish monarchy could be a compromise between republicans and monarchists.

[–] quitenormal 2 points 10 months ago

Looks like we have a movement then. Only small, so far, but ......

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Nah only compromise I’ll accept is them peacefully stepping down.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

There's something to be said for an overall "boss" to the Government. Someone with no real power day-to-day, but with the power to sack the government and force us to an election. Critically: someone outside our politics.

The one time the power was invoked, it was done terribly by a Governor General worried over his own job and for local political reasons.

If we disconnect from the monarchy, I would want that position to be retained by someone. But who? The ~~queen~~ king fills this role fairly well at the moment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There’s nothing to be said about democracy being subverted.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Even The Dismissal was not a subversion of democracy. It was a dissolution of parliment and an invocation of democracy: taking us to an election. I was a little kid, so obviously wasn't involved in the politics at the time. My dad was a die-hard Labor voter and he was furious. So, my personal memories of it are very anti-Fraser/Kerr as a result of that influence in my formative years.

But for all of that, I concede that the Government needs to be accountable to someone. I believe we need an "emergency stop" button in our constitutional makeup. I just don't think the one time it was used was a valid emergency. I think history has the same conclusion - that was not the way the power should be invoked. I doubt it'll happen again like that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

An unelected person or persons, being given control over government is not democratic.

The government, if it has to exist, needs only to be accountable to the citizens it exists to serves.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Well, if it's baked into our constitution, the implementation of such a role is created by a democratic process. So, while the individual may not be directly elected, we (or our ancestors in our case) did vote the position into existence. I wouldn't be against this person being elected directly under some future constitution, though I have concerns how they could maintain their distance from our politics if that were the case. That is a question I'd want adressed.

Conversely, a government without such a role leads to what our friends in the USA have. A system that gets bogged down in stupid politics so badly that they literally shut down their whole government every few years over their political in-fighting. They don't have anyone to force them to behave. I wouldn't want that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Given the crown has a policy of interfering with neither the decisions nor appointment of the Governor General, we could become a Republic without changing the practical power at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


As Denmark prepares to welcome a new king and queen to the throne, an unassuming pub on the opposite side of the globe is celebrating its role in the ascension of the world’s first Australian-born monarch.

Frederik, the Crown Prince of Denmark, first met the Tasmanian real estate manager Mary Donaldson nearly 24 years ago at Sydney’s Slip Inn while the city was swept up in Olympic fever, though the pub is a little different these days.

On Saturday, after picking up their wedding rings in the city, soon-to-be-married couple Adam Knight and Sharon Atherton chose to wander down to the harbourside pub best known for the modern-day fairytale.

The venue has a special menu item in honour of Frederik – the “El Frederiko Hot Dog” – a nod to Danish hotdog culture still in keeping with the Spanish language.

Birgitte Maibom, the chief executive of the Danish Church Australia, says while most people are sad to see Queen Margaret abdicate, they are excited to celebrate the couple.

The Australian government announced on Saturday it would make a contribution to Wildcare Tasmania to support the conservation of the Tasmanian devil, which is only found in the wild on the island state where Mary grew up.


The original article contains 673 words, the summary contains 205 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] DreamAccountant -1 points 10 months ago

Nooooo, Australians are supposed to suck on Charlie's nipples!

Hahahaah. Screw monarchs.