this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
27 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19141 readers
2372 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter
aidan
jordanlund
HLMenckenFan
little_cow
27
Mississippi Says Poor Defendants Must Always Have a Lawyer. Few Courts Are Ready to Deliver (www.themarshallproject.org)
submitted 1 year ago by gAlienLifeform to c/politics
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Candelestine 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, the Miranda Rights flow pretty directly from the rights given in the Constitution, there are very few (basically none) steps between the two. There's very little wiggling out of them in any way.

If we do not honor your right to have an attorney and if you cannot afford one then one will be provided to you, then we fundamentally betray ourselves. Though it doesn't say anywhere those attorneys need to have reasonable workloads and compensation.

Hence why I've always felt public defender is one of the most noble professions a person can pursue. Can't even imagine the emotional toll such a job takes out of your ass.

[–] sixtyshilling 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they can’t provide enough defense representation for their defendants, then it sounds like the State Prosecutors should be dropping more cases.

Not every minor drug infraction requires a prosecutor to push for a plea deal. Let it go and focus on the big stuff if there aren’t enough lawyers to go around.

[–] Candelestine 3 points 1 year ago

Our private prisons complicate this. They can provide local political pressure, as they are large and create many jobs.

[–] mkwt 2 points 1 year ago

Miranda (from the case Miranda v. Arizona) is protecting the fifth amendment protection from self incrimination ("You have the right to remain silent"). The right to "assistance of counsel" is in the sixth amendment, and Gideon v. Wainwright established that that means the state must provide public defenders to the indigent.

Another fun fact, the Gideon case only provided for public defenders in felony cases, and a later case, Argersinger v. Hamlin, extended this to any case that could result in actual jail time.