this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
267 points (96.8% liked)

AntiTrumpAlliance

437 readers
1 users here now

About

An alliance among all who oppose Donald Trump's actions, positions, cabinet, supporters, policies, or motives. This alliance includes anyone from the left or the right; anyone from any religion or lack thereof; anyone from any country or state; any man, woman or child.

Rules

-No pro-Trump posts or comments

-No off topic posts

-Be civil

-No trolling

-Follow Lemmy terms of service

Social Media

Discord

Reddit

Other Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GuyDudeman 78 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I... worked on this story for years... and he just... he tweeted it out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Ross_audio 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's a quote from a journalist who covered Trump.

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-worked-on-this-story-for-a-year

He uncovered Trump's close ties to Putin's inner circle, found the evidence, then Trump just said it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Haha, oh, thanks

[–] Fridgeratr 48 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Tyfud 4 points 5 months ago

Narcissists like Trump do not see them problem with this unfortunately.

[–] Steelmonkey 32 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There's a word for that it's on the tip of my tongue

[–] Bdtrngl 22 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Does it start with a T and end with reason?

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please 23 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Technically it would be emolument. Luckily, there is an emoluments clause in the constitution, (Article I, Section 9, Paragraph 8) which explains that the president isn’t allowed to accept emoluments from foreign powers while in office. And the man just told on himself on Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

It's treason, then...

[–] MotoAsh -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, no. The US isn't presently at war with Russia or China or... basically anyone (with the obvious loophole of proxy and ally wars...), so nobody is capable of legeally-defined treason.

[–] shalafi 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Everybody like to trot that word out, but is unable to define a legal "enemy". I consider Russia a fucking enemy, hate their guts, but legally and diplomatically, they're not that.

[–] Earthwormjim91 3 points 5 months ago

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/4302

It’s pretty clearly defined.

The word “enemy,” as used herein, shall be deemed to mean, for the purposes of such trading and of this chapter— (a) Any individual, partnership, or other body of individuals, of any nationality, resident within the territory (including that occupied by the military and naval forces) of any nation with which the United States is at war, or resident outside the United States and doing business within such territory, and any corporation incorporated within such territory of any nation with which the United States is at war or incorporated within any country other than the United States and doing business within such territory.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

We're still at war with North Korea. There is a declared ceasefire that has mostly held since 1953 but the latest peace talks to end the war started in 2018 and fell apart after South Korea elected a conservative government in 2023. The soldier that escaped to NK to avoid his legal troubles in SK last year may well have committed treason. Or at least attempted to, NK didn't really seem to want him.

[–] Earthwormjim91 3 points 5 months ago

The US never declared war with North Korea.

The last declaration by the US was WWII.

[–] AtmaJnana 2 points 5 months ago

No, South Korea may still be at war with them.

[–] jantin 31 points 5 months ago

I don't get $8 million for doing nothing

Aaand there goes the last credible line of defense: that his only connection was ownership and he was detached from operations and books of the company. But alas.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] SinningStromgald 6 points 5 months ago

Yes but he was president at the time so he is immune to all prosecution because he did the crime(s) FOR America. Duh!

[–] riodoro1 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Totally not punishable, the state can do nothing about it but watch him become its leader again.

But don’t you fucking dare being black and having a bud of weed on you, thats pretty much a death penalty offense.

Yep, totally a democracy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Unrelated, but this news source has higher number of ads per square inch of my phone screen than I thought theoretically possible.

[–] Mog_fanatic 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I feel like the intrusive ad world has been working mega overtime lately. Either that or I just haven't been paying close enough attention but lately I've stumbled on some mobile sites that are like 97% ads with 15 automatically playing videos and pop ups everywhere that are hilariously difficult to close without opening ten more windows

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Something something firefox mobile something something adblock.

I'm sure you've heard it, and I have no idea if you're already using it and it doesn't work. Just thought I'd get it in there before someone else who's even more of a dick about it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Something something Adblock bad something something use UBlock Origin.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Something something catch-all something something xerox

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

But then, you will not experience the monster sites like this one.