this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
115 points (97.5% liked)

News

26373 readers
3881 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kate Starbird says attacks have made research difficult, and claims of bias arise because of prevalence of lies from the right

A key researcher in the fight against election misinformation – who herself became the subject of an intensive misinformation campaign – has said her field gets accused of “bias” precisely because it’s now mainly rightwingers who spread the worst lies.

Kate Starbird, co-founder of the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public, added that she feared that the entirely false story of rigged elections has now “sunk in” for many Americans on the right. “The idea that they’re already going to the polls with the belief that they’re being cheated means they’ll misinterpret everything they see through that lens,” she said.

Starbird’s group partnered with Stanford Internet Observatory on the Election Integrity Partnership ahead of the 2020 elections – a campaign during which a flood of misinformation swirled around the internet, with daily claims of unproven voter fraud.

Starbird and her team helped document that flood, and in return congressional Republicans and conservative attorneys attacked her research, alleging it amounted to censorship and violated the first amendment.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It looks like the US right has been pretty successful in framing the debate:

She says she now refers more to “rumors” than to “misinformation” – both because “rumor” has more historical context, and because “misinformation” is a much more politicized term, co-opted by people outside the field, similar to how the legitimate phenomenon of “fake news” on social media before the 2016 election got twisted by Donald Trump into an insult to journalists.

Her team will probably not flag content to social media platforms, either. “That piece of the work has been so effectively twisted into a censorship narrative that it becomes hard to help out in that way,” she said.

[–] antidote101 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

because “misinformation” is a much more politicized term, co-opted by people outside the field

Whose outside the field of politics?

similar to how the legitimate phenomenon of “fake news”...

Ahh yes, legitimate ever since Hitler's use of "Lügenpresse".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

There was a brief period around 2016 when it actually meant what it sounds like—lies promoted by "news" organizations like Fox News

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wonder if someday in the future anyone will be able to untangle the mess America has become and point to the one person who started it all.

[–] antidote101 11 points 1 year ago

Ronald Reagan.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I doubt it was one person who started it.

And I suspect it began long ago - US political coverage in the 1990s was full of talk of partisanship. For that to have taken effect, I'm guessing it must have started ten or twenty years before.^(but I don't know what I'm talking about)

[–] captainlezbian 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah it was in the Nixon era.

[–] JustAManOnAToilet -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Papa Joe was able to have his daughter lobotomized then go on to promote his family to the point of getting his son elected president.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're not wrong about the lobotomy (see Rosemary Kennedy), but I'm unsure what you're referencing here.