this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
225 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19079 readers
4436 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The NAACP of Florida had accused the state of violating the US Constitution by imposing new limits on efforts to register voters.

all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DevCat 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Florida may, of course, regulate elections, including the voter registration process," Walker, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, wrote in the 58-page ruling. "Here, however, the challenged provisions exemplify something Florida has struggled within recent years; namely, governing within the bounds set by the United States Constitution."

Somebody figured out DeSantis' playbook.

[–] axtualdave 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You kid, but this judge is right on the money.

The core problem though, is not that it's unconstitutional or not, but that, until recently, it's unconstitutional only in name. It's like that old saying, "If no one stops you, is it really illegal?"

Florida, and to a lesser extent Texas, have been pushing to see just how far they can go with wildly unconstitutional laws on the books before the rest of the country starts to push back.

Turns out: Really far. And even if the rest of us push back hard, they've proven that they can get away with some pretty egregious things while we aren't paying attention to their bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I just don't understand why they keep going towards the more radical side of their base. That side is literally dying out, what is their plan in like 2 more elections? Younger gen is not voting for them and millennials are not going conservative like older generations have in the past.

[–] PointyDorito 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The answer is in the question. Prioritizing short term gain and an inability to consider long term consequences are what defines these people.

[–] DevCat 6 points 1 year ago

It defines every corporation in the US. Short-term gains are all that it's about.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

8 years is plenty enough time to solidify power and make it so that the only votes counted are "the good ones", AKA white republican ones.

[–] OasissisaO 12 points 1 year ago

Free State of Florida, my ass.