Technology
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
view the rest of the comments
Hardly. It's several colocated computers/drives designed to survive major events. It's insane to me sys admins still think their 7 year old desktop sitting in a closet offers the same level of protections.
It's not the tools that offer protection. It's the practices and redundancies that matter. How often are you making secondary and tertiary backups, are those backups stashed in different locations and on different media?
This business owner made the right move by not relying on a single source for backups. Too many people and small businesses don't think like that. They assume one backup is enough.
If it's really important, you should be following the 321 backup rule, no matter if you're using Google cloud or the old gateway in a closet. Without multiple backups, you're always putting your eggs in one basket. It doesn't matter how much you trust that basket, it's a dumb idea to only rely on one backup for anything important, even if its Google cloud or AWS.
Maybe they're properly designed, maybe not. How can you tell?
I think they call it testing.
But unless you can see the results of their internal tests...