this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
24 points (96.2% liked)

Casual Conversation

1910 readers
401 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Maybe some potential consolidation to discuss here?

[–] orangeNgreen 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think I even suggested that awhile back on one of those communities. It might be worth me reaching out to each of the mods to try and coordinate that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I posted on [email protected]: https://reddthat.com/post/18791125

Quoting the post here as sometimes mod remove meta posts

Hello everyone,

Randomly stumbled upon @[email protected]'s comment in another thread about the different dad communities:

[email protected]: last post 10 days ago, previous one 1 month ago

[email protected]: last post 2 weeks ago

[email protected]: last post 2 days ago, previous one 8 days ago

[email protected]: last post 2 months ago

[email protected]: last post 4 days ago, previous one 2 months ago

[email protected]: last post 2 months ago

[email protected]: last post 5 days ago, previous one 2 months ago

So I guess there are some conversations ongoing, but they are scattered all over the place.

Should we maybe discuss a potential consolidation?