this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
285 points (93.6% liked)

World News

39176 readers
4186 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] woop_woop 33 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Isn't that part of the point? If the populace suffers, government changes are more likely

[–] njm1314 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

When has that actually worked?

[–] NoLifeGaming 27 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] njm1314 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're suggesting that the end of Apartheid was caused solely by the US sanctions causing a popular revolt in South africa?

[–] NoLifeGaming 2 points 6 months ago

I did not mention it was solely due to sanctions. But I do think it played a role.

[–] woop_woop 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Arguably any revolution comes from a critical mass of the population being unhappy..

[–] jeffw -5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It’s still inhumane. It’s fine to starve people out via sanctions but not via bombings? There’s a reason people like Sanders continue to oppose sanctions

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's the inhumane condition you care about? Not the 34000 dead? Murdering journalists, doctors, food workers? None of that?

[–] jeffw 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sanctions don’t stop that. So you have a genocide and a starving populace in a second country. JFC when did Lemmy turn into a bunch of neolibs?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] jeffw 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Neoliberals love sanctions. Leftists typically oppose suffering.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Israel is a democracy, or so we have been told.

Which means sanctions would motivate the voters to elect a new government that opposes genocide. Which is the result we want.

Therefore, sanctions are justified because they would stop Israel's genocide of Gaza by forcing Israeli voters to face the consequence of voting for genocidal fascists

[–] Psychodelic 1 points 6 months ago

Why is everyone speaking in hypotheticals/theory? Sanctions have been used in the past. Has it achieved the desired result? If we don't know, maybe start with that

[–] woop_woop 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Which would be better to you? You're a civilian somewhere - do you prefer to watch your livelyhood slowly being destroyed by your government or do you want a boom?

I'd assume the former gives you a chance to recognize it and do something, the latter is just boom.

[–] jeffw 1 points 6 months ago

False dichotomy. Sanctions don’t stop genocidal maniacs. They just ADD suffering to the world. Would I rather have 1 million people suffer or 2 million? I know the answer!