Casual Conversation

1615 readers

234 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.

RULES

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling
Keep the conversation nice and light hearted
Encourage conversation in your post
Avoid controversial topics such as politics or societal debates
Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.
Respect privacy: Don’t ask for or share any personal information

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

orangeNgreen

[email protected]

140

How was your day, Lemmy? Because mine was mortifying! (self.casualconversation)

submitted 6 months ago by Astronaut_M_Dexter to c/[email protected]

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I got stuck on a lunchtime video conference today with some people in my department and a vendor. I hate meetings at noon, but with timezones being a factor, it was the only available time the vendor could meet. Usually, I'm only on these for technical consultation, so I rarely need to speak other than to clarify a point or answer questions about our infrastructure. Those are usually toward the end of the meeting.

That said, I just muted myself and ate at my desk because I was starving and would have plenty of time to eat a quick bite before it got to the point where I had to say anything.

What I did not realize was that even though I was muted, my webcam was on. So 6 people I work with plus three vendors all watched me eat a bag of tacos, and no one said anything!

Like, when I eat a taco with people around, I do eat it in a dignified way. Less so when I'm alone (or think I'm alone) and wolfing it down before I have to do something So, yeah, it was not a pretty sight.

I'm still mortified, but at least I am laughing about it as I'm typing this out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I.... Didn't have ILO or any ipmi to the system. It was a cloud VM on Azure. Looking at their management tools, they're all IP based, which means you need a valid IP connection to the system to control it.

The setting I think that did it, was in the advanced network interface settings. I'm not sure which one, but long story short, whatever it was, messed up the network interface and basically everything was useless. My manager was doing something and I pushed an Azure CLI network interface reset, whatever he was doing, and/or what I did, eventually brought it back online. Luckily throughout this all the settings I changed were reverted, and the system was power cycled, so all evidence was destroyed.... Unless it logged something to the system logs. IDK.

The programs are very file heavy and most of that weight is on IO, not throughput, so I was tinkering with the buffers, but I can't be sure that the buffer settings were to blame. I'm sure I clicked on more than just buffer settings while I was in the network adapter settings.

I'm still pretty upset about it. Azure really doesn't make it easy to connect to the stupid console. Then again, hyper-V is mostly the same way, so....

I prefer running another hypervisor technology, but we're pretty heavily invested into Azure at my workplace, so I'm not sure that even suggesting it will get any traction.

The part that annoys me is that everything is built glass cannon style. Get big, fast systems in Azure, throw everything into those few systems and run it. It only takes one person running prime 95 for fun and profit(?) to wreck the ability for anyone to do meaningful work.

Glass cannon. Azure isn't a golden ticket that can handle all the workloads with a minimal number of virtual machines, but we're committed to a server-less architecture, even when the client would be better off with local, or colo, given their relative size. Like a quarter rack in a nearby colo, and a couple of hyperconverged systems and they would be very well served. It wouldn't be very different from what they're doing right now, either functionally or physically (or even cost-wise), but they would get a lot more out of it.

Suggesting it would be a lot like talking to a wall.