this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
1123 points (98.4% liked)

Political Memes

5511 readers
1112 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HydraulicMonkey 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They would have to justify how it is a part of the companies operations. In theory at least.

So a private jet to fly your execs to business meets? Ok.

A yacht? Maybe for entertaining customers? I don't know about the US, but here in Australia entertainment expenses are written off at a lower rate than other business expenses.

[–] TheEighthDoctor 4 points 7 months ago

A yacht can have meeting rooms, you can receive clients in these meeting rooms for business purposes, making it therefore a business expense.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

here in Australia entertainment expenses are written off at a lower rate than other business expenses.

Sorry mate. Not really correct.

If an Australian company pays for entertainment expenses for staff, it's considered a fringe benefit and fringe benefits tax is payable. It equates to almost the cost of the actual expense. So if a company pays $10k for an employee to take a holiday, they'll have to pay almost $10k in fringe benefits tax, but they do get a deduction for the whole $20k, which will save them $5k in income tax.

[–] HydraulicMonkey 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, so to simplify, written off at a different rate.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not really, at all.

It's written off at the same rate, while being subject to a whole other type of tax, which means the company pays more tax, rather than less.

[–] HydraulicMonkey 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ok, so the point I was originally trying to make was that claiming a yacht as an entertainment expense was less attractive. Would you agree?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If sticking a fork in your eye is "less attractive" than eating icecream then sure.

... but let's be honest, that's not what you were trying to say. You were just plain wrong. Get over it. No one cares.

[–] AngryCommieKender 2 points 7 months ago

The only one who can't admit they were wrong here is you.