this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
120 points (97.6% liked)

World News

39374 readers
2854 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

France's defence minister received his German counterpart on Friday to ink a deal between the two countries to build a next-generation battle tank.

Defence ministers of France and Germany met in Paris this Friday to ratify an agreement on a new joint tank project called the Main Ground Combat System (MGCS).

This formal agreement kick-starts the development of the first phase of the armoured vehicle, dubbed the ‘tank of the future’ – a project worth billions of euros.

The new battle tank is set to replace Germany’s Leopard 2 tank and France’s Leclerc.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The m1 consumes about 6 gallons per mile.

In a large war that is a lot of fuel and supply lines.

I know of Iraq/Afghanistan. They were testing solar to power the bases because they required so much diesel, and those were the convoys being attacked.

I know people will call it woke but we need to green up the military to protect lives.

[–] ThePyroPython 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Well the military already considers climate change a threat to national security.

[–] gaael 11 points 8 months ago

I hope they start shooting billionaires private jets soon then.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I would agree. As the climate changes, what is important will change.

I think the average person outside of America doesn't grasp the size of America. We have enough water, land, etc to feed our population if we plan correctly. Other countries don't have that luxury and wars can be caused over a shortage of water and food.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You are busy fucking that up though. Through fracking for example.

Also, plan correctly? When is the US going to try to start doing that?

[–] RubberElectrons 1 points 8 months ago

We are, collectively, working to change that.

Redwood materials is trying to close the loop on lithium recycling from ev purposes, we can expect us military-industrial companies to take advantage of the cost savings, if for no other reason than to say "here's a silent tank, we're pocketing 60% of the unit cost for.. Development.. Reasons"

From acorns grow tremendous trees, it's likely there will be a big change from an unexpected avenue.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago

I don’t frack. So I’m not sure you mean by you. Nor do I support fracking. Gas should be expensive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

The M1 generally has a higher fuel consumption due to its turbine engine. Instead of babbling nonsense for media attention, maybe suggest some solutions though. Because superchargers along the battlefield aren't one of them.