this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
105 points (92.0% liked)

science

14671 readers
795 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gabu 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

VIIII is a valid way to write 9, though antiquated. If you look at very old clocks, you'll see they all use this notation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Didn't realize homie was an antiquated clock. (Assumed the usage of Roman numerals, like in the references being made, in which case I don't believe the clumsy VIIII only used on old clocks would really be valid.)

[–] TheControlled 4 points 6 months ago

This made me really laugh. Thought I would let you know 😂

[–] Gabu 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

VIIII wasn't exclusive to clocks, that's the only long-lasting example we still have access to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Your point is that VIIII was ever used in history? Happily conceded.

[–] Opisek 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The reason clocks use it, is to not make it look visually unbalanced. Most often they write 4 as IIII. I find it infuriating to break such a simple rule though.

But also, I've never ever seen VIIII.

[–] Gabu 2 points 6 months ago

Julius Caesar's memoir of war in Gaul makes use of VIIII, for instance. You're right that it's much rarer, but was still used contemporarily and in modern times.