this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
43 points (95.7% liked)

UK Politics

3089 readers
17 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Australia did the same thing and it worked, simply sending them back.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

That's not the same thing, then, is it?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

'worked'?

What we've done and are doing in Australia is fucked. What is wrong with you?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Australia placed asylum seekers in an island detention centres with inhumane conditions. Is that what you want to hear? To validate your opinion and agreement to the Rwanda bill? The UK Supreme Court ruled that Rwanda is not even a safe place. Do you see Rwanda like the Australian detention centre because you are a piece of shit? Do you have any more sealioning questions to validate how much of a piece of shit you are who is no worse than smugglers abusing asylum seekers? The Rwanda bill is not even popular among the British when polled except for pieces of shit. Is that the answer you want to hear?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nice try, you grotty little person.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Says the one who wants to watch children drown in the sea because they came in unregulated boats.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Such compassion. So genuine. You're a credit to the human race.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You literally want people to have a reason to get into flimsy boats with their children and drown in the English channel.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

How do you live with yourself?

[–] steeznson 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is true. Australia managed to completely stop small boat arrivals. However their deportation scheme was even more harsh than the UK/Rawanda proposals. From what I understand people who arrived by boat there were detained pretty much indefinitely on an island detention centre. I think they might have ended the policy because it was so brutal. Not sure that politicians would be able to do that here without a public outcry.

Interestingly, Australia is consistently one of the most pro-immigration countries in the world, and has been for the past 10+ years. I read an article in the Economist that suggested people were more happy with immigration if they believed their borders were secure.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I guess it makes sense if they have safe and legal routes, then there's not much harm in punishing those who arrive illegally. The Rwanda policy does seem more humane than this, so that's a good thing.