this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
696 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59062 readers
3473 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2ncs 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"user-applicable fix" is hardly correct, they are installing a fix provided by the company that has the recall. The company just so happens to provide an over the air download to patch the issue instead of having owners go to a dealer.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Where is the car being recalled to? I get that that's the word that stuck for 'critical fix' or whatever but if you don't need to bring it back that's not a recall. Call it something else.

they are installing a fix provided by the company

So the user is applying the fix? What else do you expect that to mean?

[–] aesthelete 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why do you give such a shit about this word?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry for wanting things to mean what they mean

[–] aesthelete 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It could easily be written in a longer statement such as "recalled for service" which is still 💯 accurate but the service is being done remotely instead of at a shop.

There are just so many other things to give a shit about in even the realm of "words meaning what they mean" that it seems like a very random, stupid thing to get hot and bothered about.

You're probably one of those guys who has Twitter threads where you're quoting Webster as an argument aren't you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

If it's being done remotely it is not recalled, that's my entire point.

Most of my bother comes from how people are reacting with kneejerk appeals to the status quo instead of actually responding to what I (and others) wrote, think of me what you will

[–] aesthelete 1 points 6 months ago