this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
620 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19923 readers
4266 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you have things you think he did wrong then I can tell you why I disagree

The things he was charged with.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And like I said, it was normal perfectly legal things. If you want to get more specific then feel free, or if you want a more in depth explaination feel free to listen to the evil billionaire that you hate for reasons.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And like I said, it was normal perfectly legal things.

And like I said: "it was legal, trust me bro" is not a legal defense.

If you want to get more specific then feel free

The evidence and arguments presented by the prosecution. You should be well familiar with them seeing as you know the case so well.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I already told you these things, you can claim your property is worth whatever you want, they said you cant. And as I already explained property tax does not reflect the actual value, they pretended it does.

There you go, I just told you the states arguments but you keep not wanting to listen. But sure, it was totally not a targeted prosecution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He signed a legal business document saying "I believe the property is worth X". I signed another legal business document saying "I believe the property is worth Y" (notably not X).

Telling one person one thing and another person the opposite is textbook lying.

Lying in signed legal documents is fraud.

Your "knowledge" of the case clearly only comes from what Faux News has told you, which makes you less knowledgeable than someone who has been living under a rock.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So then anyone that is selling their house for more than the property tax value is committing fraud? Great, now show me the tens of thousands of people that have done this that has been prosecuted.

Check out this fraud! The property is listed at $43 million and the tax assessment is $1.1 million, the fraud is insane! This person is in New York, they can sieze all their assets!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

None of the documents in the case have to do with selling the property.

If you were as familiar with the case as you claim you would know that. You would also be able to cite arguments from the case itself, not unrelated Red Herrings.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

Even worse, they sold houses for more than the assessed value AND they had loans on them for more than the assessed value! That is double fraud! But I get it, you dont know what is going on so you will keep saying "BUT YOU DONT KNOW ABOUT THE CASE!!!" when you are the one that thinks applying for a loan and property tax values are the same.

And I see you didnt name anyone else in New York that has been convicted of this "FRAUD!!!!!".