Apple

17540 readers

86 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:

No NSFW Content
No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

MichelleG

RoyalEngineering

thisisdee

147

First game emulator to be approved in the AppStore - iGBA (apps.apple.com)

submitted 7 months ago by QuarterSwede to c/apple_enthusiast

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Looks to be based on GBA4iOS.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kautau 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

As long as it doesn’t include a bios file, and is completely free (including no in app purchases), I doubt it. Emulators like igba are all over the Google play store, Nintendo only shows its fangs when they try to make money or contain proprietary code.

And actually, looking at it

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.fastemulator.gba&hl=en_US

There are paid android emulators on google play, so if Nintendo hasn’t already taken them down, I can’t see them doing that here

[–] cbarrick 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

An emulator, even a paid one, would be totally legal in the US as long as:

It does not use any patented technologies. I'm not sure if Nintendo has any patents in the emulation space, but regardless the GBA is so simple that it wouldn't require patented techniques to emulate.
It does not contain any proprietary (copyrighted) code. On more modern consoles, this would include the BIOS or Firmware files. Does the GBA even need something like that?

Number 1 is a non-issue for a GBA emulator. Number 2 is more tricky, but it's always possible to reverse engineer and reimplement the firmware. That's protected by the Compaq v. IBM case.

The recent drama with the Switch emulator is that they violated the second principle.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What proprietary code did they have?

[–] QuarterSwede 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Stupidly, the decryption key.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Which is probably not copyrightable. A key is just a number, and copyright only applies to creative works. In a court, Nintendo would have to argue that copyright does apply because the key was created via some artistic or creative process by a human. It likely is just the output of a random number generator. Also, we’ve already been through this when people figure out how to decrypt DVDs.

[–] QuarterSwede 1 points 7 months ago

You’re forgetting about the DMCA.