Drama in the Fediverse

1200 readers

3 users here now

Welcome to the Lemmy Drama community!

This is a place to share and enjoy drama across the fediverse. Grab your popcorn, and dive in!

Rules:

1. Don't bring your own drama.

If you are a part of the drama, don't post it here. We're here to enjoy drama, not see it brought to this community.

2. Be civil.

No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. No ongoing drama.

if there’s been a comment in the past 3 days, wait until it’s settled down.

5. No interacting with the drama you find here.

That means no upvotes, no downvotes, and no commenting in the original thread.

6. Keep the drama focused on Lemmy and/or the fediverse only.

If it’s Kbin or Mastodon drama, it must be a quality effort post.

7. Don’t piss on the popcorn.

Inciting brigades is an automatic ban.

8. Mod Perogative

We reserve the right to enforce the rules however we like.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava

breadsmasher

TrickDacy

Kagi search engine, mod censorship, fun stuff (awful.systems)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/lemmydrama

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Here's how I see it:

Some person posts criticism of Kagi
CEO of Kagi emails the person saying, I think some of what you said is factually inaccurate and I'd like a chance to talk to you about why
Person angrily refuses to do that
Mod of !techtakes publicly posts screenshots in his sub instead, calls the CEO an unhinged narcissist and his email a "harangue"
People come in the thread and say, actually what the CEO said sounds "totally hinged" and the rude response seems un called for
Mod starts banning people and deleting comments of people who are arguing with him, leaving up his own side of the conversation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah you're right. I think the original author is also trying to hide behind the fact his post didn't get traction to make this "actually this was quite private" when it wasn't.