this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
145 points (94.5% liked)

World News

38545 readers
2048 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Russian ambassador had harsh words for Finland on Saturday, warning that the country would retaliate against the new member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) if nuclear weapons were placed on Finnish soil.

Finland is one of the newest European countries to join the military alliance, being officially welcomed into the fold in April 2023. The Nordic nation was spurred to seek membership by Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and its increased threats of aggression against other nations. Sweden is the latest country admitted to NATO for this reason, joining on March 7.

Both nations announced that they were considering applying for membership in May of 2022, only a few months after the start of the Russia-Ukraine war.

Russia has long viewed NATO as an antagonistic force, given the influence of founding members like the United States and the United Kingdom. NATO members are also obliged to provide military aid to other members in the event of an attack, meaning that Russia risks a much larger conflict should it take action against the likes of Finland.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We control the weapon on their land but they get to drop it in a war.

That's a contradictio in terminis.There's no way the US lets other counties decide when to drop their nuclear bomb.

The real reason of course is the US wants influence, and the countries it wants influence over agree to it to get other shit done.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It’s only for nato countries. The United States has to authorize the attack but yes, the other country gets to drop the bomb. It’s all in the article.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago
  1. Contents of the agreement are not referenced in the article
  2. If the US has to authorize it, then no the other country doesn't 'get to drop the bomb'. The country gets to push the red button when US says 'fire'.

And as I stated before, the nukes aren't deployed in those countries because the countries want them there, it's because the US want them there, and has the 'persuasiveness' to get them there.