this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
59 points (92.8% liked)

Space

9241 readers
675 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula

Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography

Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L7ePvmEn
Bitswap
[email protected]
Agamemnon
otter
59
Space experts foresee an “operational need” for nuclear power on the Moon (arstechnica.com)
submitted 10 months ago by kinther to c/space
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teft 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

We can still make radiation free metals. It’s just way more expensive than recovery of pre WW2 metals.

Bringing a nuclear reactor to the moon wont contaminate the iron there unless you detonate the reactor near the surface and even then it will only contaminate the iron directly below the blast. The reason steel on earth is contaminated is because we use air that is contaminated with radionuclides in the manufacture of steel. No air on the moon means no contamination.

Also the radiation has fallen pretty much back to background levels since we stopped atmospheric testing so modern steel is generally radiation free. Only the most sensitive steels need to be low background steel. Another 50 years or so and we should be back to baseline.