this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
123 points (93.6% liked)

politics

19956 readers
4826 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Who is coming at me with arms? Who have I provoked such a response from?

Lol, I know this may be hard to accept, but this is not about you. If you have enough privilege to live in an area where people don't already have preconceptions of criminality based on your race....good for you.

Some of us live in dangerous areas, some of us are not the same color as you, some of us have already experienced racial violence, some of us love people who are being targeted for their sexual preferences.

This is the most privileged take I've ever seen on Lemmy, and that's quite the high bar. You are effectively claiming that any victim of violence must have somehow provoked it.

People don't randomly go and fire guns when people aren't in the middle of their protest or any other people.

I guess you're just ignoring violent hate crimes?

Safe to say, gun violence is put on kids because the neck beards have nothing better to do than target those that can't defend themselves.

What was that?

target those that can't defend themselves.

Hmmm, that seems to me like a good reason to be able to defend yourself?

[–] GladiusB -5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You mean when the guys with guns that are hired to protect the kids without guns didn't protect anyone? Yea. You are adorable thinking that you convince anyone with such arguments.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

You mean when the guys with guns that are hired to protect the kids without guns didn't protect anyone?

It's almost like the state apparatus that is supposed to protect is failing in multiple ways? No what does that strawman have to do with mutual aid and protection networks?

The book I was talking about wasn't about theory, it was accounts of actual events. Often with the primary source being a person who partook or benefited from the mutual aid network.

It's not really about tactics or personal defense, it's about how important community building is for disadvantaged groups. About how sometimes similar to your early example, the state fails to protect these groups from radical political violence.