this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
508 points (99.6% liked)

Damn, that's interesting!

4671 readers
1 users here now

  1. No clickbait
  2. No Racism and Hate speech
  3. No Imgur Gallery Links
  4. No Infographics
  5. Moderator Discretion
  6. Repost Guidelines
  7. No videos over 15 minutes long
  8. No "Photoshopped" posts
  9. Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 135 points 10 months ago (3 children)

But instead, we decided to make a very small number of people extremely rich.

[–] givesomefucks 45 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Bernie is pushing for 32/week.

If he was president we might have gotten it, but Biden sure as shit isn't even going to mention it.

American workers are more productive than at any point in history, it's just all the wealth goes into a very small number of pockets, and instead of having to pay taxes, they pay a small percent to politicians in both parties to ensure workers don't get any

[–] njm1314 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say we'd have gotten it. Being president doesn't mean you control Congress.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

We nothing. Hold the people who voted for Reagan responsible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How do I argue that this is a bad thing to my boss.

I will preface by saying that my boss is a great guy. I don’t have targets and I get freedom and feel empowered in that sense.

But we often debate about the world and he seems to argue that on the whole society is doing a lot better than we did in the past. Living longer, more luxuries etc.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

On the whole.... how would you define that? The mean? The median? If it's mean, he may have a point because the richest people don't have to work for many thousands of years each. But the median person is likely under poverty level.

And better..... also what is the definition of that? More money? More free time? Less crime/risk of injury? Etc.

And then there's the case that it doesn't matter if it's "better" than it was however arbitrary time ago, it matters that it could be better for a massively greater percentage of people. But in the current state it is only insanely better for only a select few, and nearly the same for the vast majority of people.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Thank you for this. You’ve definitely given me some points to touch on.

For what it’s worth, I agree we should do better.