this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
88 points (95.8% liked)

[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation

6588 readers
1 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Examples:

I help train fortune 500 tech companies' AI algorithms.

I am Time Magazine's Person of the year 2006.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] breadsmasher 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That was an older example, and not really a great question. But it did demonstrate they didn’t have a deep grasp of things on their CV

everything below is just my personal opinion

To be clear I don’t have a draconian “camera on or fuck you fired” approach. I mean this more as what I see as a reasonable expectation from someone fully working from home.

Ive heard the “inviting into your home” argument, but when its a fully remote job, it kinda comes with the territory and should be expected. I am lucky enough to have a separate room to work from, but I still also use a virtual background. I can’t recall anyone who doesn’t at least blur it out.

Fully remote work comes with the expectation of having a private working area, away from disturbances etc. Where its less like inviting someone into your home, and more like they are in your personal workspace.

As well, to be more specific. When I would personally have my camera on and a reasonable expectation others would, is in meetings / calls where the invitees are all expected to be participating, not meetings where you’re invited and sit there wasting time for an hour.

IMO, after working from home years, communication is noticeably and significantly clearer and more productive when we can see each other