this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
164 points (95.1% liked)

Public Health

360 readers
3 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link ([email protected])


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (23 children)

One PPM of chlorine is enough to kill most amoeba in about 10 mins.

If amoeba can survive in tap water where you are at, you probably shouldn't drink the water without filtering and boiling it first anyway.

Also, get some multi-chemical water test strips as well. While those don't tell the full story, they can be useful if deciding to have your water tested at a lab. (Test strips a decent enough at detecting chlorine, some metals, salts, etc. I don't know if they exist, but detection of disolved gasses, like natural gas, would be a huge plus if you live in an area that has a lot of oil drilling.)

Everyone should spend at least a few bucks to know what they will be drinking at home on a regular basis, IMHO.

[–] tool 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

While those don't tell the full story, they can be useful if deciding to have your water tested at a lab.

Everyone should spend at least a few bucks to know what they will be drinking at home on a regular basis, IMHO.

Lab testing is going to be a waste of money for most people not using well water, unless you have a strong reason to suspect something is up aside from test-strip reaults. Especially seeing as how the water chemistry is going to change at least twice per year when the water provider switches from chlorine to the chloramines and vice-versa. And pretty much all providers will give you a report of exactly what's in the water on a monthly basis if you ask for it.

Lab results would be useful if you're serious about homebrewing beer and don't want to build up the water profile from scratch or really into baking, though. Just don't do it in the early Spring/Fall, because that's when the treatment chemicals switch and the results aren't going to be representative of what the water is really like for that time of the year.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

My stomach is super picky and I drink a ton of water. It doesn't take much to mess me up.

Even perfectly clean water will trigger my acid reflux, but that is more of a mechanical issue with my stomach, from what I understand. The bigger moral of the story here is not to be a raging alcoholic for many consecutive years...

I even get monthly water reports automatically due to the number of lawsuits my town has had because of water quality. Needless to say, my trust level is not set at maximum even for third-party reports paid for by the city.

You ain't wrong, but the redundancy makes me feel better.

[–] RubberElectrons 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I've heard, and read, that the test strip approach isn't very accurate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

IMHO, it shouldn't need to be. With test strips, my only intent is to see if there is something drastically off kilter. pH tests are likely the most reliable of any of them. If tap water pH is wildly off, there is likely something else wrong.

Excluding some cases, just a taste of the tap water should tell you volumes more than what a test strip might.

[–] Aux 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But it's good enough for regular people. Very accurate test equipment costs tens of thousands of dollars and you have to recalibrate it every few months using very expensive consumables.

[–] RubberElectrons 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nah. I paid $43 for my lead test via Virginia tech, as that's a concern I have with my new (very old) apt building: https://leadkit.hbbf.org

If you need to test for the common 9 dangerous items test, it's $160: https://mytapscore.com

[–] Aux 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's one single test and you don't get equipment. You're just sending your sample to the lab, which has all the stuff. I mean that's a great option, but you're not getting accurate testing devices for that price.

[–] RubberElectrons 0 points 8 months ago

Not interested in having the equipment. Not sure where I said that either.

load more comments (20 replies)