this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
1023 points (96.6% liked)

News

23388 readers
2340 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“There's this wild disconnect between what people are experiencing and what economists are experiencing,” says Nikki Cimino, a recruiter in Denver.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] voracitude 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry you can't tell the difference, let me try again with a question: Does everyone who "makes the most expensive purchase of their life" end up living cheque to cheque because of that purchase?

[–] Cryophilia -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] voracitude 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Why not, if the size of the purchase is the dominant factor in the equation? Which, remember, is quite literally what the OP here said: https://lemmy.world/comment/8540177

“I just made the most expensive purchase of my life and I can’t figure out why I am living paycheck to paycheck.”

So I ask again: why are you trying to insist that the problem is the amount of money spent, rather than this lady not doing the maths? Surely it makes sense that the not doing the maths is the problem here?

[–] Cryophilia -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What do you call it when you are both splitting hairs and beating a dead horse? Splitting a dead horse?

She made an expensive purchase. She is now paying more money for it. This causes her to have less money. This causes her to be paycheck to paycheck. What exactly are you disputing here?

If she decided to purchase name brand canned green beans, and it ended up costing twice as much as generic, that was also her "not doing the math". But it would not harm her finances to a noticeable degree.

Saying the the size of a purchase has no bearing on its effect on your budget is so ridiculous I can't believe I'm entertaining this discussion at all.

As a matter of fact, if your next response isn't something vaguely worth taking about, I'm done with this whole...whatever this is.

[–] voracitude 0 points 8 months ago

It's the fact that she can't figure it out that's her problem, not the fact that she bought something big. She could have done the same with beanie babies at $20 a pop and run up a hundred thousand in debt over the course of two, three, four years, whatever. She'd be in the same situation, but without a house. The problem is not the purchase, it's that she's bad with money, jesus fuck it's like nobody on this fucking website understands how logic works.

Tell you what, I'm gonna block you now because you're giving me brain cancer with all this exposure to your idiocy, so don't worry about responding; I won't see it.