this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
533 points (96.3% liked)

politics

19101 readers
3891 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said policy differences toward Israel between her and President Biden won’t stop her from supporting him in the November general election.

“Of course,” Omar said Tuesday, when asked by CNN’s Abby Phillip on “NewsNight” whether she would vote for Biden if the election were held that day, in a clip highlighted by Mediaite. “Democracy is on the line, we are facing down fascism.”

“And I personally know what my life felt like having Trump as the president of this country, and I know what it felt like for my constituents, and for people around this country and around the world,” Omar continued. “We have to do everything that we can to make sure that does not happen to our country again.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

>You, the 3rd party voter, can’t even cite when they have ever made a dent in the nation-wide voter

you never asked, and, frankly, there is a cure for historical illiteracy, too

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sure, try arguing when was the last time third party has made a dent, and by what percentage. Cure my supposed historical illiteracy please.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

>Sure, try arguing when was the last time third party has made a dent

the prohibition party got an amendment passed

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ooh, wow, a party no one heard of, and are you talking about 1919? And this has nothing to do with vote percentage?

Color me shocked and amazed by your argument.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

this is called a "horse laugh" fallacy or, formally, an appeal to ridicule

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Did you know that I pointed out issues with your arguments? So, address them.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

>Did you know that I pointed out issues with your arguments?

no. you raised irrelevant objections.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Then, explain it if that's the case.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

what's the point?

i don't believe you're open to learning anything here. anyone who is reading this conversation can easily make up their own mind about who's right.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Other people reading the room is precisely why I am with you in the room now. I'm not doing this to change your mind.