this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
400 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

59156 readers
2286 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Warl0k3 141 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (54 children)

As much as I loathe m$, the one thing they got right was forcing casual users (windows home) to install security updates as top priority, whether they like it or not. I know we all hate on windows, and rightly so, but that policy does nullify this particular vector and that is great for the consumer-level users.

(... for the sake of argument lets just pretend windows doesnt have 10,000 other vulns the malware devs can just exploit instead)

[–] halcyoncmdr 97 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Also keep in mind that the main reason Windows is targeted for so many exploits is because of the consumer market share. If Linux consumer market share goes up, so will general malware targeting it. We already saw it happen when OSX share increased and Apple had to abandon the whole "Macs don't get viruses" schtick.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

We already saw it happen when OSX share increased and Apple had to abandon the whole "Macs don't get viruses" schtick.

It's kinda crazy that Apple got away with spinning "Our products don't sell well enough for this to be a problem" into a marketing point for as long as they did.

[–] Bimbleby 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I assume they said it was due to other reasons than obscurity, although we know better.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

It was due to other reasons, too.

One of the main malware vectors back then was Internet Explorer (and specifically ActiveX), Outlook Express, and MS Office macros. That's not just a matter of obscurity; it's because Microsoft specifically wrote very shitty software with no regard for security. Netscape was not nearly as exploited as IE even when it was the leading browser.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (50 replies)