this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
44 points (94.0% liked)

Formula 1

9210 readers
51 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2025 Calendar

Location Date
🇦🇺 Australia 14-16 Mar
🇨🇳 China 21-23 Mar
🇯🇵 Japan 04-06 Apr
🇧🇭 Bahrain 11-13 Apr
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia 18-20 Apr
🇺🇸 United States 02-04 May
🇮🇹 Italy 16-18 May
🇲🇨 Monaco 23-25 May
🇪🇸 Spain 30 May-01 Jun
🇨🇦 Canada 13-15 Jun
🇦🇹 Austria 27-29 Jun
🇬🇧 Great Britain 04-06 Jul
🇧🇪 Belgium 25-27 Jul
🇭🇺 Hungary 01-03 Aug
🇳🇱 Netherlands 29-31 Aug
🇮🇹 Italy 05-07 Sep
🇦🇿 Azerbaijan 19-21 Sep
🇸🇬 Singapore 03-05 Oct
🇺🇸 United States 17-19 Oct
🇲🇽 Mexico 24-26 Oct
🇧🇷 Brazil 07-09 Nov
🇺🇸 United States 20-22 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar 28-30 Nov
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi 05-07 Dec

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“The stewards reviewed positioning/marshalling system data, video and determined that the video appeared to show that Car 4 moved before the start signal was given,” their report began.

“However, the FIA approved and supplied transponder fitted on the car did not indicate a jump start.

“Article 48.1 a) of the Formula One Sporting Regulations states clearly that the judgment of whether or not there was a jump start is to be made in accordance with the transponder, which did not show a jump start. In the circumstances, we took no further action

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So if the transponder is faulty(hypothetically) or just not sensitive enough, does that mean people will get away with false starts¿?

[–] june 2 points 10 months ago

That appears to be the case.

He jumped, clear as day, but the transponder didn’t reflect that so he got no penalty.

[–] Maalus -3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You don't know when it's faulty, so no.

[–] june 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Doesn’t answer the question lol

[–] Maalus 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It does. He asked if people will "get away with it". They won't. 99.99999% it will work correctly. Nobody is going to test it / risk it.

[–] june 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The question was ‘if it’s faulty will people get away with it’.

You answered ‘you don’t know if it’s faulty’

That is not the answer to the question. The question that answers is ‘can you game the system with a faulty transponder’.

The answer to the question is actually yes. If the transponder is faulty the driver will get away with a jumpstart.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No as in there won't be a penalty or no as in there will be a penalty¿?

[–] Maalus 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If it's faulty, you don't know that it is. Which means you can't reliably use that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

And that is what i am trying to highlight through my question. The rule is enforced completely based on the transponder but if its malfunctioning then drivers will not be penalized as the the transponder has not picked up their jump start.

[–] Maalus 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That the rule having no flexibility is stupid. It is obvious from the videos that Norris jumped the start but because the rules are based purely on the signals from the transponder, he has escaped punishment.

[–] Maalus 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So instead they should make up a rule on the spot that wasn't in the rules previously to punish them

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I am not saying lando should be punished. I am saying that the rule should be reviewed and updated for the future to handle cases technology cannot/ fails to handle.

[–] Maalus 1 points 10 months ago

Then you end up with unfeasible rulebooks that cover every minute detail. And then something unexpected pops in, because of course it always does.

The reality of it is - false starts are rare. A broken transponder is rare. Getting both are very unlikely, and ultimately on the ones making them instead of the team.