this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
533 points (93.5% liked)
People Twitter
5456 readers
348 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
To be fair, most of them were actually run over, not shot.
It boggles the mind that they think this is a valid argument.
Edit: I know it isn’t true, it was a bullshit claim initially made by the IDF. But how is running them over instead even remotely better?
Something like 100 of the ~ 115 dead had bullet wounds, but that doesn't include the 700 or so wounded.
Wrong. The only source for that claim is the idf. Doctors who received the wounded said 80% had gunshot wounds.
Are we into triple digits for "shit the IDF says that's soon proven to be utter bullshit" yet?
Everything I've read said the majority where hit by bullets, source?
It was an initial claim made by the IDF.
I guess a /s was needed