this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
533 points (93.5% liked)

People Twitter

5456 readers
348 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kim Iversen on the Flour Massacre.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

To be fair, most of them were actually run over, not shot.

It boggles the mind that they think this is a valid argument.

Edit: I know it isn’t true, it was a bullshit claim initially made by the IDF. But how is running them over instead even remotely better?

[–] HappycamperNZ 33 points 10 months ago

Something like 100 of the ~ 115 dead had bullet wounds, but that doesn't include the 700 or so wounded.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Wrong. The only source for that claim is the idf. Doctors who received the wounded said 80% had gunshot wounds.

[–] ikidd 15 points 10 months ago

Are we into triple digits for "shit the IDF says that's soon proven to be utter bullshit" yet?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Everything I've read said the majority where hit by bullets, source?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

It was an initial claim made by the IDF.

I guess a /s was needed