Once again, this is an actual question; and I'm hoping to broaden my horizons and have a good conversation or two. I'm relatively new to commie subs, still trying to read political theory to figure out which one I like the most, so this might come off as uneducated. But why am I seeing so many positive posts about Stalin, followed by some comments that boil down to "Stalin was good, if you think he wasn't, that's just western propaganda" I'm thinking of the post that mentioned the 1921 Soviet Famine as a specific example.
I know that Stalin didn't create the famine, it was a byproduct of almost a decade of war, unrest, and a ton of other factors. But Stalin did do some bad shit. Things like sending 14 million people to gulags to work as slave labor, and killing millions more in his purges. I would argue that he used communism to become an authoritarian. Similar to how Putin is ruling now, stuffing ballot boxes, starting wars, and pushing propaganda. (I realize that we get pushed propaganda, too in the form of faux news, MSNBC, and most media outlets. I don't wish to have a discussion that boils down to "we do it too, you just don't see it")
14 million gulags π was there anyone left in the USSR after Stalin imprisoned them all???
Do you know how absurd the logistics would be for the imprisonment of 14 million people???
To put this into context, the United States imprisons about 4.3% of it's population and represents 20% of the global prison population... It's like 2ish million people in American prisons.
Well I'm gonna hold on to this statistic for later use. The absurdity of 14 million being imprisoned is enough that is should stand on it's own but maybe the direct comparison to the US prison system might drill it home a bit more.
It's funny how these people can't realize how absurd their myths about communism are. The myth about Stalin arresting people who were first to stop applauding him after a speech is one of my favorites.
Exactly, how could the Nazis have killed off 12+ million people systematically while also losing troops in a war and still have people left?
By exterminating them you Nazi piece of shit. They didnβt care if they starved, got sick and died, had adequate housing, died from exposure, were infested with parasites, had adequate clothing, had enough water, or so on.
Thatβs why they massacred them right off of the trains and left the rest to work to death.
Eat shit you Nazi. Take your Holocaust denial and get lost.
Hey, dumbshit. It's called making a stupid argument against someone's stupid argument.
Did you even read the comment I replied to?
Hey, dumbfuck. Did you happen to read the comment I was replying to and perhaps make some inference on the point I was making?
Or are you just fucking stupid, which would explain why you simp for a genocidal dictator.
Hey, dumbfuck. Did you happen to read the comment I was replying to and perhaps make some inference on the point I was making?
Or are you just fucking stupid, which would explain why you simp for a genocidal dictator.
Hey, dumbfuck. Did you happen to read the comment I was replying to and perhaps make some inference on the point I was making?
Or are you just fucking stupid, which would explain why you simp for a genocidal dictator.
Hey, dumbfuck. Did you happen to read the comment I was replying to and perhaps make some inference on the point I was making?
Or are you just fucking stupid, which would explain why you simp for a genocidal dictator.
Hey, dumbfuck. Did you happen to read the comment I was replying to and perhaps make some inference on the point I was making?
Or are you just fucking stupid, which would explain why you simp for a genocidal dictator.
Hey, dumbfuck. Did you happen to read the comment I was replying to and perhaps make some inference on the point I was making?
Or are you just fucking stupid, which would explain why you simp for a genocidal dictator.