this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
1002 points (99.1% liked)

News

23423 readers
4536 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just because you have a firearm doesn’t make you part of the “gun people” generalization.

Actually that's kinda exactly what it means when people say "all gun owners blah blah blah."

Do you fantasize about getting to shoot your gun? Have you tied your identity to your arsenal of guns? Do you feel the need to open carry at the grocery store? Do you open fire on cars in your driveway?

No, no, concealed (especially after Buffalo), and the last one is called "crime."

No? Then you’re not in the “gun people” group being talked about. People who own guns are not the same as the “gun people”, or “gun nuts”/“ammosexuals”.

Disagree. If I say all women are sluts, but then some nun says "well I'm not," I can't claim I wasn't talking about "all women" when I said "all women." It's preposterous. By that same coin, when someone says "all gun owners," they can't claim to "only be talking about the bad ones.” One should instead be more specific, like say "irresponsible gun owners blah blah blah," if one wishes to make the distinction between "all" and "bad."

*Disclaimer: No, I don't believe all women are sluts, I was using it as an example of a stupid generalization specifically. I shouldn't have to add this disclaimer, but we all know I have to before some cheesedick decides that was my argument and argues with a strawman.

[–] hips_and_nips 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

“Gun people” != “all gun owners”

They didn’t say “all gun owners” they said “gun people” which to anyone with awareness can infer it means the people who tie their identity to their weapons.

What a shitty analogy to women, I’m not even going to touch that.

Would it have been clearer if the original comment said “irresponsible gun people”, sure, but it wasn’t and self-centered people want to be the victim when they haven’t understood they aren’t even in the group.

I’m Dutch and even I could glean the intended meaning from the context.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah so if I say "woman people" I'm not talking about all of them, only a specific subsect that I failed to describe, and then I'm confused why people think I'm generalizing?

C'mon, "gun people" is a clear generalization that clearly implies "all gun owners." He could've said "irresponsible gun owners" to single out those who he wished to refer to, but he didn't, thus the "confusion." If it was actually his wish to single out those people, actually doing so in the future would help his posts not be misunderstood.

Lol yes, don't bother touching how dumb generalizations are, make them instead.

So you're telling me that making generalizations about a group is good, and if someone in that group feels like the generalization is unfair and doesn't reflect them or reality, they should stop being a snowflake? You by chance voting for an orange this election?

Ah, Dutch, that explains it. The Dutch love to generalize.