Not The Onion

12558 readers

761 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay

227

Woman loses £650,000 injury claim after being seen tossing Christmas tree (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 10 months ago by philopher to c/nottheonion

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ericbomb 70 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Happened to my mum!

She said she felt like someone was following her as she kept seeing a new car outside and she didn't know who it belonged to.

My sister who lives with her said she was crazy.

Surprise surprise, few months later she gets a letter with pictures of her sometimes leaving the house saying they did an investigation.

Since the pictures were mostly her limping heavily to take her service dog out to go to the bathroom it was fine.

But yeah its no joke, but makes sense. My mom has been on disability near 10 years, that's 400k+ in benefits paid out. Paying 2k for a private investigator only has to work a small percentage of the time to save money.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Kind of weird that they would send the pictures when the result of the investigation was that the claim was legitimate.

Or do they have to legally provide that info I don't know how it works

[–] ericbomb 3 points 10 months ago

Could just be their policy. Don't know more I'm afraid.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

So they legally have to release the pictures after a while? That would be good to know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I mean let’s be real here. The year is 2024. You are being watched.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And of course the government is bought and paid for so no one is arresting them for stalking charges

[–] ericbomb 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean PI's are legal.

Laws are complicated. But as long as they don't cause a nuisance and stay on public property, they're no more invasive than paparazzi's after all.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 1 points 9 months ago

They are technically legal but really shouldn't be. They have been used historically as a rent-for-hire police force and we have enough problems with real police forces that have much more oversight. The solution to poor regulations isnt less regulations, it is better regulations.

But as long as they don’t cause a nuisance and stay on public property, they’re no more invasive than paparazzi’s after all.

Not to be too snarky but if I a middle aged man who looks like a construction worker was following a woman in your life around taking pictures of her how would you feel? And yes feelings matter. Consent is fucking important and I am tired of people dismissing it. Just because I have the ability to lawfully do something doesn't mean that I should or that it should be acceptable that I do.

People should have a right to be left alone and not be stalked. And if that means the occasional worker gets a slightly bigger settlement then they should so be it.

Oh and fyi I have been on the receiving end of this. Right when I graduated I took a job with a corporation that had a weapons division (I didn't even work in that department) and under a week after I started my neighbors told me that someone started asking about me. Plus I had a car follow me around. Mentioned it at work to my new boss and he said the same thing happened to him when he started.