this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
449 points (91.3% liked)

AntiTrumpAlliance

515 readers
1 users here now

About

An alliance among all who oppose Donald Trump's actions, positions, cabinet, supporters, policies, or motives. This alliance includes anyone from the left or the right; anyone from any religion or lack thereof; anyone from any country or state; any man, woman or child.

Rules

-No pro-Trump posts or comments

-No off topic posts

-Be civil

-No trolling

-Follow Lemmy terms of service

Social Media

Discord

Reddit

Other Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AA5B 22 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I just did a quick search to brush up on why Andrew Jackson is a bad president, and I found a lot of similarities about corruption, ruling for personal gain or spite, authoritarianism, distrusting professional merit-based employees and replacing with personal loyalty-based amateurs , etc. Jackson starts with a lead as a war hero, but then again Trump didn’t try to destroy native Americans

[–] formergijoe 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He did try to get a native casino in Connecticut closed in 1993. Part of his testimony to Congress was "You're saying only Indians can have the reservations, only Indians can have the gaming. So why aren't you approving it for everybody? Why are you being discriminatory? Why is it that the Indians don't pay tax, but everybody else does? I do."

Also in 2000 Trump paid over $1 million on a smear campaign managed by Roger Stone against the St. Regis Mohawks in protest of their opening of a casino in the Catskills.

So nothing while president, but still not a great track record when dealing with native Americans.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Let's not trivialize an actual genocide by comparing it to racist business dealings.

[–] Lemming421 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

but then again Trump didn’t try to destroy native Americans

He was quite happy for millions of Americans (regardless of ethnicity) to die rather than do the minimum amount of work to get Covid recognised as an actual problem, not to mention actively peddling bullshit theories that probably made things even worse.

I'm not an historian, but from what I know about Jackson, you could make the argument "he was an asshole, but he was of his time", whereas Trump is an asshole regardless of what decade it is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Jackson was not an asshole of his time, he was drastically worse. Do not whitewash the trail of tears

[–] RememberTheApollo_ 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I conditionally disagree. It’s fine to judge the past by today’s standards, that’s how we know we’ve changed and are doing better.

However you must also judge them framed in their own time. Was the dude impaling his conquered opponents on spikes normal for the time or did neighboring kingdoms go “WTF, dude?!” If normal, he was NTA then, but definitely the asshole by today’s standards.

Understanding correctly framed history is not whitewashing. Changing, minimizing for gain, or cherry-picking history to meet today's standards is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You're acting like people in the 1830s just didn't know that ethnic cleansing and genocide of Native Americans was wrong.

They did know. And some, including SCOTUS, tried to stop Jackson. They failed. And Native Americans paid the price.

This country was built on human slavery and genocide. Do not minimize or turn away from those evils

[–] RememberTheApollo_ 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

This country was built on human slavery and genocide. Do not minimize or turn away from those evils

Can you stop with this shit? Nobody here is denying anything. We are discussing how we frame history from a modern perspective and whether or not the general population (not some minority) in Jackson's time viewed his actions as unacceptable. If you don't want to have that discussion, go wear your sandwich boards and earplugs elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

"We" are actually discussing how this country was built on slavery and genocide. Turning away from that fact because it makes you uncomfy won't bring back those who were murdered by the United States

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 8 points 7 months ago

Jackson starts with a lead as a war hero

Holding New Orleans against the British to preserve southern slavery for another half-century is hardly something to brag about.

[–] Thoth19 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Jackson also blatantly committed the high crime of ignoring a lawful court order from the supreme court. But congress knew it was political suicide to censure him for the trail of tears(which was absurdly popular) so he wasn't impeached for it.

Trump is pretty bad. But he didn't order a genocide and flout checks and balances to do it. Not that he isntr trying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think attempted genocide still counts, tbh.

[–] Thoth19 1 points 7 months ago

I think successful genocide is worse bc we know he went through with it. It's theoretically possible that trump wouldn't even though I'm 99 percent sure he would.