this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
688 points (98.3% liked)

News

23369 readers
5757 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlexibleToast 8 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Lol, just migrate it... Like it's that simple. Many companies have gotten vendor locked in to specific cloud providers and the services they offer. You can't just flip a switch and move to Azure or somewhere else. Assuming other clouds even have the capacity to take on all of AWS clients all at once... And it's not just websites, many government and even military servers are in AWS these days.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I guess if nothing else it would create new jobs, that's important, right?

[–] FlexibleToast 4 points 9 months ago

It would keep me gainfully employed. There would probably be a huge demand for OpenShift and its cloud agnostic design after that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Truth. Whenever I’ve asked an enterprise architect whether the company should really be vendor-locked to the point of using proprietary cloud-native services they say it will never matter. Tech workers think in terms of the two or three years they stay in each role.

(Amazon and MS are nothing on the extent to which Oracle owns you if you invite the Devil in.)

[–] FlexibleToast 3 points 9 months ago

I work for Red Hat, we're doing our best to fight that kind of vendor lock in. Hybrid cloud and expand out to whichever cloud you want. The vendor lock in is serious out there.

[–] grue 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlexibleToast 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Them is all of us. Things like Centers for Medicare and Medicaid run in AWS. Just about every service the government provides probably has some piece on AWS. Turning off AWS would not end well.

[–] Maggoty 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The physical servers would change ownership and the AWS standard between them would slowly diverge. Same kind of thing as the baby bells.

[–] FlexibleToast 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Do you mean the Bells that have reassembled?

[–] Maggoty 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well yeah but when they were broken up one of the fearmongering things was the physical infrastructure. There's no reason to believe this would be any different. Just hopefully with less monopoly a couple decades down the line.

[–] FlexibleToast 2 points 9 months ago

This is a little different than a phone company. But you're right that breaking them up would be the much more sane thing to do rather than shutting them down. It's not easy to migrate servers, it is easy to change who you're paying.

[–] grue 1 points 9 months ago

Oh well, sucks to be us!

[–] Maggoty 4 points 9 months ago

All the important military servers are secured. We could do with losing all the PowerPoints with a bad animated mascot telling you that you do in fact have to stop at a stop light.