this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
625 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

12223 readers
1023 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dipshit 127 points 8 months ago (2 children)

“Airline tried arguing virtual assistant was solely responsible for its own actions”

that’s not how corporations work. that’s not how ai works. that’s not how any of this works.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Oh, it is if they are using a dump integration of LLM in their Chatbot that is given more or less free reign. Lots of companies do that, unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If it's integrated in their service, unless they have a disclaimer and the customer has to accept it to use the bot, they are the ones telling the customer that whatever the bot says is true.

If I contract a company to do X and one of their employees fucks shit up, I will ask for damages to the company, and They internally will have to deal with the worker. The bot is the worker in this instance.

[–] lunar17 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is that companies will start hiring LLMs as "independent contractors"?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

No, the company contracted the service from another company, but that's irrelevant. I'm saying that in any case, the company is responsible for any service it provides unless there's a disclaimer. Be that service a chat bot, a ticketing system, a store, workers.

If an Accenture contractor fucks up, the one liable for the client is Accenture. Now, Accenture may sue the worker but that's besides the point. If a store mismanaged products and sold wrong stuff or inputted incorrect prices, you go against the store chain, not the individual store, nor the worker. If a ticketing system takes your money but sends you an invalid ticket, you complain to the company that manages, it, not the ones that program it.

It's pretty simple actually.

[–] dipshit 5 points 8 months ago

Oh, I believe it.

[–] Delta_V 8 points 8 months ago

My 2024 bingo card didn't have a major corporation litigating in favor of AI rights in order to avoid liability, but I'm not disappointed to see it.