this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
27 points (93.5% liked)

UK Politics

3110 readers
293 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Squeak 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I don’t agree with that. I think age verification is fine for things like online alcohol sales.

[–] br3d 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

There's a difference though. Very few people would care if the government knows they bought some whisky, and very few would care if that information leaks out. But people will care a lot if the government know what porn they're consuming and WILL care if this information leaks out

[–] Squeak 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No, I agree it shouldn’t be implemented for this. I was just using the ole’ lemmy switcheroo, because I think the comment I replied to was implying porn should be banned.

[–] cm0002 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

because I think the comment I replied to was implying porn should be banned.

Oh he definitely was, take a look through is profile and you'll see comments like this:

Because you're deliberately trying to lead people away from God and telling people that they can trust their carnal desires instead.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I was literally showing a person how ridiculous their argument for banning religion sounded in that comment by switching perspectives for them, but hey, who needs context 😜

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

But people will care a lot if the government know what porn they’re consuming and WILL care if this information leaks out

It's an odd one, I'll tell anyone down the pub who asks (although everyone seems to change the topic when I bring it up) and wouldn't object to the government knowing, but I'd object to the government demanding to know everyone's porn habits.

[–] cm0002 3 points 9 months ago

Yea, that makes sense, where I've seen it implemented here in America typically your ID is checked at point of delivery/pickup which also avoids the whole having to upload your ID to some random third party thing

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

But when it comes to objectifying women, 18 doesn't necessarily mean mature enough in the eyes of men.

[–] Squeak 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And what about women objectifying men?

Is there ever a ‘correct age’ to objectify anybody? Porn isn’t always about objectifying women, even if that is how you see it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Fair point. But about age, tbh, should ban it entirely

[–] Weslee 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's a good job my porn doesn't have women in it then!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

Unironically defeated my argument 🫢