this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
883 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59579 readers
6183 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
883
Wi-Fi jamming to knock out cameras suspected in nine Minnesota burglaries -- smart security systems vulnerable as tech becomes cheaper and easier to acquire (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/technology
238 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AA5B 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That’s the standard: cheap and easy. Every lock I’ve bought since I’ve owned a house has had this. Done.

But not enough. One of my doors was clearly kicked in for a previous owner, yet I saw long screws into the frame. That doesn’t guarantee they were there at the time but they might have.

Regardless, the jamb is thin wood not really supported by anything. Screwing the strike plate into the framing helps, but that doesn’t keep the jamb from buckling and breaking until the door is no longer held by the strike plate. Reinforcing that jamb can make a huge difference against a standard burglar.

How about a 60” steel reinforcement?

Or here are some good ideas - residential doors already have some of these covered by opening inward, rather than out